132. (31556-!-item-!-188;#058&004545) A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980. (A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
(A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times (B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times (C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio (D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio (E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
看过关于这题得以前一些的帖子,都还没有说出我的心里话,所以再问。首先肯定两件事情:as compared to没有错,我确定;compare to 只能用被动,也很确定。所以B不对 D和E是典型的宾语从句名词化错误,也不选。只在A与C中选。 prep笔记解释的不选A的理由是compared to的比较对象不对象,我同意。A去掉所有的副词,就是...earn an average of pay, compared to a ratio...确实不等。 但问题是,同理类推,C中the ratio不是也不能作为42 times their pay的同位语了吗? 42 times是修饰their pay的,那么a ratio能去解释前面的修饰语吗? 顺面问一下,twice their pay这种结构,twice是什么词性呢?
|