ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 枣糕兔
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 【Native Speaker每日综合训练—39系列】【39-09】文史哲 Privacy

[精华]   [复制链接]
31#
发表于 2014-7-21 16:34:18 | 只看该作者
[补作业]
[speaker]
go for a drive: go where pleasant, enjoying some nice places
picture: v. imaging something will be
the ride of your life: best possible of your life, best vocation
off-road vehicle:a car or trunk that designed without any roads, not on the road
gravel:  materials that small rocks put on the  road

[speed]
Time2: 2'23''
Although the Google is trying its best to provide a workable solution to their responsibility for the personal data, there are three parts to their response raise the doubt of the author: First is the removal of the search result, second is that search results for individuals using European versions of Google will now often include a message at the bottom that reads, and the third comes the part of the response which has triggered the most dramatic results.

Time3: 2'09''
According to the two cases of Ball and Peston, it can be seen that Google might be deliberately undermining the ruling seems possible.

Time4: 2'11''
A well-executed reform, with a better written, more limited and more appropriate version of the right to be forgotten could be the ultimate solution here. If that can be brought in soon -- rather than delayed or undermined -- then we can all move on from the Google Spain ruling, both legally and practically. Everyone might benefit from that.

Time5: 2'48''
To discuss the question that for today how well the Supreme Court is grappling with new technology, the author take the example of a case involving the patentability of a genetic test to show that the court has more power based on the modern cellphones.

Time6: 1'58''
It is gratifying that a court that often has trouble understanding new technology had little trouble holding that the cellphone represents something new.The court doesn’t seriously try to figure out how much people are really injured if a police officer looks at information on their cellphones, instead, the justices are relying on their own personal experiences. As a result, they are thinking about what’s on their cellphones and how they would feel if a police officer saw them. As for the rest of society, we’re as opaque to them as DNA.

[obstacle]
Time7: 11'58''
In wolf's view, he conceives of life this way: as a gift that you’ve been given, which you must hold onto and treasure but never open. It has something to do with preserving life’s mystery, and that is an artist’s sense of privacy. Even as they put their lives on display, she thought, artists thrive when they maintain a final redoubt of privacy—a wellspring that remains unpolluted by the world outside.
Woolf’s abstract, inner sense of privacy bears the stamp, of course, of a very particular time and place. An artist’s privacy is a state of mind, rather than a matter of law, there are no rules to help us master it.


The New Yorker那篇文章没有看得很懂,但其中很多句子很好啊!mark~
32#
发表于 2014-7-21 17:36:04 | 只看该作者
[speed]
2:57
Google has been sued to illegally use individuals' links on the web page. and they need to eliminate such links in four days. Google's response may already leads to problems.
if they remove the data, people can still find a way to search in other ways.
2:50
Google may cause censorship. use two journalists to illustrate the point.
2:30
Google is carrying out the censor. once you research for the article, the author's name will also shows up.
3:11
The supreme court has ruled that police cannot look through individuals' cellphones. we all have some kind of secrets in our cellphones.
2:23
The court should do some research to find out whether the info in the cellphones is important. The author uses his own story to illustrate this point.

[obstacle]
12:23
Everyone has a wall inside himself/herself, between his soul and sould, between him and his wife.
Woolf loves city, she loves the solitude inside the city.

33#
发表于 2014-7-21 18:48:58 | 只看该作者
ZOEYZHANG114 发表于 2014-7-20 05:57
long articles....Miss myself for a while when i was reading....Thank you.

so, my dear new friend, remember to write down your memorization, even your own ideas about the topic, or your front page seat will be taken!
34#
发表于 2014-7-21 18:50:02 | 只看该作者
charming9386 发表于 2014-7-20 09:24
GET IT ,keep calm and carry on

glad to see you write down your thoughts about the passage after reading! why don't you write more and we'll learn more from each other!
35#
发表于 2014-7-22 00:02:05 | 只看该作者
掌管 7        00:03:11.51        00:23:06.13
掌管 6        00:08:59.57        00:19:54.61
掌管 5        00:02:00.85        00:10:55.04
掌管 4        00:02:27.94        00:08:54.18
掌管 3        00:02:01.33        00:06:26.23
掌管 2        00:02:11.92        00:04:24.90
掌管 1        00:02:12.97        00:02:12.97

Obstacle
This passage shows Woolf’s idea of privacy through her novel "Mrs. Dalloway"— there is no final, satisfying way to balance our need to be known with our need to be alone.
36#
发表于 2014-7-22 00:36:37 | 只看该作者
39-9
Time2 2:11
the European court state that Google should attention 3 pros.and google offer three ways.
Time3 2:21
EX for overreaction. more censorship, the journalist feel bad.
Time4 2:19
google reacts in line with ruling, but far worse.
Time5 2:13
why the cour offer the question. why the phone is different. the phone has so many information that the police can not access it.
Time6 1:59
the personal privacy is so important.we should protect it.
Obstacle 09:00
a story about the privacy.
37#
发表于 2014-7-22 09:45:55 | 只看该作者
Time2 2'22''
Google responds to the request for the removal of personal information in 3 ways:
1.the removal of research result 2. the removal of the message in the bottle of the article 3. notification that triggers many dramatic problems.

Time3 2'13''
Google is deliberately undermining the rule and the three responses would contribute this situation.

Time4 2'42''
Google can respond better to keep balance between the privacy and the free expression by reforming the process of Data Protection Regime.

Time5 2'24''
The court decided  that the police cannot read through the cellphone of suspect without first obtaining the warrant.
The chief Justice thinks that the cellphone is different from old form of wallet or something else.

Time6 2'29''
What degree the cellphones contain the privacy information is a problem need to be investigated.
Justice should balance the privacy and the legitimate government interest.

Obstacle: 6'12''
The though of Virginia Woolf about the privacy
Privacy is certain innerness that cannot share with others and treasure in mind.
The price of privacy,including marriage, friendship
The power of the privacy: learning to appreciate the inner life and cultivating the ability to analyze the inner mind.
38#
发表于 2014-7-22 11:14:41 | 只看该作者
time 2: 02:23
time 3: 02:12
time 4: 02:31
time 5: 02:17
time 6: 02:19
Obstacle: 09:43+ 03:19
Privacy def.
W suggests another way: innerness
Modern life lets us know that there is something to lose in life
Privacy has benefits and costs E.g Romantic scene with Peter
Benefits is the strangely power

Rest: Sharing works the opposite.
Balance is the uncertainty
39#
发表于 2014-7-22 11:41:27 | 只看该作者
speed
time2 [399 words]2'34"=155/m
according to a research, Google collects customers' data.
the attitude of Google towards it is curcial.
if the conslusion is ture, Google is responsible in 3 aspects

tmie3 [378 words]2'48"
issue:the commentaries of 2 famous jourlanists seem irrelevent to Google-thing
but:commentaries are about Google's strategy-censorship
fact:Google tries to undermine the ruling from the aspects of censorship
     detail of strategy

time4 [415 words]2'28"
attitude of the author:
google's attitute towards the affiar is inportant in solving this problem
google is powerful.
the right way for google is to face the issue positively
the ultimate solution in author's opinion

time5 [465 words]2'46"
main idea:how well the Court deal with new technology
topic development(by examples):technique is needed to help police
further debate:shoule police search information in suspector's cellphone
since it is different from traditional items.

time6 [429 words]2'43"
conclusion of debate 1: searching cellphone information requires warrant because
it is privacy
dabate2:it;s none of the court business whether should search cellphone
information
information may be curcial and dangerous
author attitude to 2:sympathetic ,for it is supported by few
author attitude:technology,personal belief,social norms should be considered
together
how does police deal with this issue practical

[Paraphrase 7]
pravicy of artist
example--what artist's privacy is
how did C hold her own art privacy in her life
40#
发表于 2014-7-22 16:34:37 | 只看该作者
3:55.98The Google is faced with a big problem.
3:20.44The Google is faced with a big problem.
2:59.46The google should do something to deal with some problems it met now.
3:36.67The court can make someone be crimed through his or her phone.
2:56.73The seirous thing what we should think about carefuly is that we should take care whether a police read our informarion by the phone.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 07:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部