【Native Speaker每日综合训练—39系列】【39-09】文史哲 Privacy

ywj1

cherry6891 发表于 2014-7-20 07:59
39-09
time2
European ruled that search enginen like Google should be responsible for the personal d ...

谢谢楼主

vivianpdn

3'18
google is undermine the right of forgotten for some people.

2'52
google is possibly undermining the ruling for three factors:
shows it makes more censorship;
it alerts that make people in which feel more sensorship;
makes journalists feel more censorship.
there are another factor other than the three potent one:maybe this is only clumsy and teething problem

4'40
google should actively concentrate on the protecting privacy regime.

3'40
our privacy is vulnerable and easy to get when some incidents occured.

3'21
some people are concerned about their privacy on cellphones ,others are not.
high-tech ; people should treat more seriously on their smartphones.

9'18
the greatful of innerness.
the privacy in artists'eyes,not from storiesand other informations.

油桃F

[Time 2]3'49
[Time 3]2'45  
[Time 4]3'32
[Time 5]3'24
[Time 6]2'59

obstacles
each of us has a certain innerness and there is sth about the feeling of self-protection.
artist's privacy and this privacy has both costs and benefits.

f0070515

speed
time2 2:06
google's response to removed people's information required caused problems
time3 2:03
Ball's and Peston's cases, which did not seem to fall into oblivion.
time4 2:17
google has acted as censor
a well-executed reform, with a better written ,more limited and more appropriate version of the right to be forgotten could be the ultimate solution here.
time5 2:19
police cannot read through the cellphone taken from someone they arrest without first obtaining a warrant.
time62:03
a separate opinion wonders why the Supreme Court should decide how important the privacy interest is in one’s cellphone contents.
Obstacle
the way to think abouy privacy in "Mrs Dalloway"
an artist’s sense of privacy
each of us has a certain resolute innerness which we cannot share with others
costs and benefits to maintaining this kind of inner privacy.
hurt to the core but remain “impenetrable”
you gain another, strangely spiritual power: the power to regard yourself abstractly.

小蘑菇开始打怪

谢谢~~

speaker:

the man invite the woman to a drive and the car can be drove in various road

time2:

search engine should be responsible for personal data appeared on web pages

google is required to delete some links

time3:

google’s response may contribute to

1. create more censorship

2. create an atmosphere people feel more censored

3. make journalists feel censored

time4:

google can do to response:

engage with the ongoing reform process

a better reform with a more limited and more appropriate version of right

time5:

police can use the privacy information to convict crimes

the new smart phone can store many info

time6:

people have different view on the privacy

how court use the new tech and deal with the info collected from the cell phone

time7:

W enjoyed the urbane life because you can involve in the fantastic life and find what you want in your deep heart

remaining impenetrable, each one has his own soul

inner privacy

疏离无罪

先占～～～～～～～

Speaker: Talking about a ride of off-road vehicle.An exciting ride.

02:24
After Google is sued about the privacy of its search result in europe,the company took three actions to response these request of removing personal search result.

02:16
Google were deliberately attempting to undermine the ruling by making it seem either unworkable or a dangerous form of censorship.

01:51
Google still have problems in this censorshop thought it has tankenThe most important thing that Google can do in response to the court ruling is to engage positively and actively with the ongoing reform process.

01:42
The superme court passed some rules about the privacy protection on people's smart phones.

01:51
Althought they focus on privacy interest,but they do not know how significant the privacy interest is.The court doesn’t seriously try to figure out how much people are really injured.

12:47
Another defination of privacy:you shield yourself not just from others’ prying eyes, but from your own.It's artist’s sense of privacy.Many people accept the idea that each of us has a certain resolute innerness—a kernel of selfhood that we can’t share with others.There can be something enjoyable, even revelatory about that feeling of self-protection.There are costs and benefits to maintaining this kind of inner privacy.At the same time, the benefits of remaining “impenetrable” can be profound.And you gain another, strangely spiritual power: the power to regard yourself abstractly.

ffffionabear

占~~感谢兔子~~
————感谢！！！嘿~你的作业~不，是你的作业~(￣_,￣ ) ~~~#作业天天见~~#~~~进击的阅读小分队~~~\(^o^)/~——————————————————
[speaker]
The boy who love take venture gain a off-road vehicle which can travel on any terrain to pick up the girl.But the girl just want to a ordinary driving in the country.
[speed]
2'54
Google nowadays accepts personal request for eliminating search results related to their identity privacy.But as huge volume of requests to links removed,there comes three problems:
1.The removal of the search result directs at certain key words,it can still be found in any other way.
2.It only work using European version of Google
3.Notification will be sent to the publishers if theirs article includes the requester's identity,which is upsetting.
3'19
Google might be deliberately undermining the ruiling because:
1.they make errors on the side of things that people wish to be blocked to create more cencorship.
2.They can alter search results far more than putting the actually one by rulings,creating an more cencored atmosphere.
3.by sending notification to jouralists,making the media feel the censor.
2'24
Google's working on removal requests worse the privacy problem.The most important thing should be positive engagement and enhancement of data protection regime and reforming process.
2'51
The Supreme Court decided that the police cannot read the cellphone of someone being arrested without a warrant because nowadays,cellphones contain gigabytes of personal data.
2'19
The Supreme Court do not actually know about the youngsters gown up with technology like smartphones and Facebook.Many people don't care about privacy,but some do, what's the differences between them while using cellphone,how many people will be injuried if police look their cellphone?Those question should be answered base on empirical investigations.
[obstacle]
6'25
main idea: Privacy is unprediable and priceless,and also can be enjoyable.It's a resolute innerness and a power of regard yourself abstractly.
3'10
The social media force us to describe the privacy limit----we share what we can share,and the sharing limites the openness because the balance of our give-and-take is provisional and uncertain.

chenxiaojing

03:02-399
Google is asked to remove the research results according to the new count rule. And google has to manage 3 parts to the request
04:00-378
Google is being suspected of overreacting deliberately or it’s just too clumsy.
03:40—415
The problem of such rule till now and it seems it’s the google that carry out the censorship
03:24-465
The count rules that the police will have to request warrant if they want to search the smart phone because it contain too much personal data.
03:16-429
The author doubts the count rule that it actually doesn’t know clear and understand clear about the privacy in the cellphone.
15:43-1705
The passage talks about the inner privacy of one person by a story as example. It may means self-protection, self-respect or those treasured feelings. Also there seems to be cost and advantages of keeping an inner life.
06:08-772
The author take another story for example that people always pursue balance between inner life at the same time of leading a social life.

chenxiaojing

03:02-399
Google is asked to remove the research results according to the new count rule. And google has to manage 3 parts to the request
04:00-378
Google is being suspected of overreacting deliberately or it’s just too clumsy.
03:40—415
The problem of such rule till now and it seems it’s the google that carry out the censorship
03:24-465
The count rules that the police will have to request warrant if they want to search the smart phone because it contain too much personal data.
03:16-429
The author doubts the count rule that it actually doesn’t know clear and understand clear about the privacy in the cellphone.
15:43-1705
The passage talks about the inner privacy of one person by a story as example. It may means self-protection, self-respect or those treasured feelings. Also there seems to be cost and advantages of keeping an inner life.
06:08-772
The author take another story for example that people always pursue balance between inner life at the same time of leading a social life.

ROLEDAD

[补作业]
[speaker］
go for a drive: go where pleasant, enjoying some nice places
picture: v. imaging something will be
the ride of your life: best possible of your life, best vocation
off-road vehicle:a car or trunk that designed without any roads, not on the road
gravel:  materials that small rocks put on the  road

[speed]
Time2: 2'23''
Although the Google is trying its best to provide a workable solution to their responsibility for the personal data, there are three parts to their response raise the doubt of the author: First is the removal of the search result, second is that search results for individuals using European versions of Google will now often include a message at the bottom that reads, and the third comes the part of the response which has triggered the most dramatic results.

Time3: 2'09''
According to the two cases of Ball and Peston, it can be seen that Google might be deliberately undermining the ruling seems possible.

Time4: 2'11''
A well-executed reform, with a better written, more limited and more appropriate version of the right to be forgotten could be the ultimate solution here. If that can be brought in soon -- rather than delayed or undermined -- then we can all move on from the Google Spain ruling, both legally and practically. Everyone might benefit from that.

Time5: 2'48''
To discuss the question that for today how well the Supreme Court is grappling with new technology, the author take the example of a case involving the patentability of a genetic test to show that the court has more power based on the modern cellphones.

Time6: 1'58''
It is gratifying that a court that often has trouble understanding new technology had little trouble holding that the cellphone represents something new.The court doesn’t seriously try to figure out how much people are really injured if a police officer looks at information on their cellphones, instead, the justices are relying on their own personal experiences. As a result, they are thinking about what’s on their cellphones and how they would feel if a police officer saw them. As for the rest of society, we’re as opaque to them as DNA.

[obstacle]
Time7: 11'58''
In wolf's view, he conceives of life this way: as a gift that you’ve been given, which you must hold onto and treasure but never open. It has something to do with preserving life’s mystery, and that is an artist’s sense of privacy. Even as they put their lives on display, she thought, artists thrive when they maintain a final redoubt of privacy—a wellspring that remains unpolluted by the world outside.
Woolf’s abstract, inner sense of privacy bears the stamp, of course, of a very particular time and place. An artist’s privacy is a state of mind, rather than a matter of law, there are no rules to help us master it.


The New Yorker那篇文章没有看得很懂，但其中很多句子很好啊！mark～