- UID
- 852313
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-1-25
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
[补作业]
[speaker]
go for a drive: go where pleasant, enjoying some nice places
picture: v. imaging something will be
the ride of your life: best possible of your life, best vocation
off-road vehicle:a car or trunk that designed without any roads, not on the road
gravel: materials that small rocks put on the road
[speed]
Time2: 2'23''
Although the Google is trying its best to provide a workable solution to their responsibility for the personal data, there are three parts to their response raise the doubt of the author: First is the removal of the search result, second is that search results for individuals using European versions of Google will now often include a message at the bottom that reads, and the third comes the part of the response which has triggered the most dramatic results.
Time3: 2'09''
According to the two cases of Ball and Peston, it can be seen that Google might be deliberately undermining the ruling seems possible.
Time4: 2'11''
A well-executed reform, with a better written, more limited and more appropriate version of the right to be forgotten could be the ultimate solution here. If that can be brought in soon -- rather than delayed or undermined -- then we can all move on from the Google Spain ruling, both legally and practically. Everyone might benefit from that.
Time5: 2'48''
To discuss the question that for today how well the Supreme Court is grappling with new technology, the author take the example of a case involving the patentability of a genetic test to show that the court has more power based on the modern cellphones.
Time6: 1'58''
It is gratifying that a court that often has trouble understanding new technology had little trouble holding that the cellphone represents something new.The court doesn’t seriously try to figure out how much people are really injured if a police officer looks at information on their cellphones, instead, the justices are relying on their own personal experiences. As a result, they are thinking about what’s on their cellphones and how they would feel if a police officer saw them. As for the rest of society, we’re as opaque to them as DNA.
[obstacle]
Time7: 11'58''
In wolf's view, he conceives of life this way: as a gift that you’ve been given, which you must hold onto and treasure but never open. It has something to do with preserving life’s mystery, and that is an artist’s sense of privacy. Even as they put their lives on display, she thought, artists thrive when they maintain a final redoubt of privacy—a wellspring that remains unpolluted by the world outside.
Woolf’s abstract, inner sense of privacy bears the stamp, of course, of a very particular time and place. An artist’s privacy is a state of mind, rather than a matter of law, there are no rules to help us master it.
The New Yorker那篇文章没有看得很懂,但其中很多句子很好啊!mark~ |
|