CECE的作文贴

dreamcece

这个。正在努力中，昨天出去Halloween出去玩了。。。

dreamcece

Young people nowadays have no influence on decisions that determine the future of the society as a whole.


The topics around young people are never vanished. When asked about the ongoing uproar involving youth power , most people say young people are too young to make decisions . But I personally think that young people nowadays exert effect on the decisions making that determin the future of society as a whole.
It is the truth that young people are usually underestimated for their shortages. Compared to the experienced elders, the youth sometimes are tend to be more motional and too rush to make the huge decisions. Besides, it is also true that the youth have little impact on lots of decisions because they are less experienced, standing no authority in determinations. Culture has it that experienced people take in charge of significant decisions, yet I consider the understimation as a sterotype and young people nowadays can influence decision making.
A great reformer in recent China once said, and I paraphrase here, that if the youth in country are aggressive and have strong amibion, then the country is tend to be strong in the future. The importance of young people can no longer be emphasised and this is exactly why government inclined to pour resources using on the youth. Youth themselves can influence the decision by impressing decision makers. Take the most common case for example, social networks like facebook and twitter are largely dominated by young people which intensly impact the decision makers that almost all the governments and institutions set account on these social media. Without young people, facebook and twitter can never be something, which is changing the world we are in now.
Except for being the external factor of decision makings, the young can make influencial decision themselves. Every year, the United Nations holds a forum involving excellent youth from different countries and backgrounds to discuss and debate the international eye-catching topics, like environment and war. Voice from the extrordinary young people are heard that they exert direct impact on the decision makings. In addition, young people today are more informative than they do before thanks to the internet. In return, the youth can somehow be more sensitive and more capable for the trivial problems if they are fully prepared. Compared to the elder people, the youth now have more resource to look for, and more energy to support their creative mind. Furthermore, the youth themselves are more aggresive and more ambitious than the elder, so that they can bring renovation to the public. Another specific example is that most of the great people start off their astonishing career when they were young, Mao joined the reform when he was 26-year-old, and Mark Zuckerberg began facebook when he was in university.
In all, the youth can make a difference on future world and so they are doing it now.

dreamcece

The lecturer expresses her negative attitude toward the three options mentioned in the reading passages which are focus on helping Torreya survive in Northern Florida.

The first option is to rebuild the Torreya in original area. However, the lecturer objects it because it is unlikely to succeed. The lecturer mentions that the microenviornment has already changed because of the larger climate is differential, possibly due to either the global warming or the local drying out.
The second option suggests that move Torreya to another location. Nevertheless, the lecturer go against this idea by giving the outcome from another real case, the migration of Black Nocers. She says that the Black Nocers were so quickly spread that they kill a lot of originated trees, some of which were already endangered, making them distinct. The unexpected outcome appears because of the unbalance of the ecosystem.
The third option is to preserve Torreya in research centers. Nonetheless, the lecturer opposes that to resist a species for seasons, genetical diversity should be assured. Due to the large size of Torreya, there are no capacity to preserve a large amount of Torreya in the research centers and therefore, the option cannot preserve the Torreya to survive in a long term.

小滋滋

等11.2独立

dreamcece

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should buy things made in their own country; even the price is higher than same things made somewhere else.
Intensive boycott against Japanese goods is now prevailing in several part of China due to the complex historical and political conflicts between the two countries, which raises a heated discussion about whether or not people should buy things made in their own country. Since I have learned some basic assumptions about the international trade, I do not agree with the autarky economic growth model.
According to Ricardo, the 19th cententury English neoclassic economist who focus on various aspects on economic phenomenon after the industrial revoltion, trade is good for every aspect of economies. In his Ricardian Model, two countries with similiar technology and resources. Name Home country and Foreign country for the two objects we are going to analysis. Home country can produce 10 units of rice or 20 cars, Foreign country can produce 15 units of rice or 45 cars. It is not hard for us to calculate out the opportunity cost for each country to produce every one unit of rice, and it turns out that Foreign country has aboslute advantage in producing both rice and cars, but Home country has comparative advantage in producing rice. Therefore if the trade should happen, Home country should specialize in producing rice, while Foreign country produce cars. In total, the two countries can enjoy 10 units of rice and 45 cars, and under trade, each country can gain more product than they did in autarky status. Setting a reasonable world or trade price, then the two countries can all better off because their customers can enjoy more good and gain more utility, and workers can also enjoy a higher real wage because their productivity raises as well.
Except for the academic model for example, boycott foreign countries’ goods does not really represent patroit. Instead, the nonsense blocking out can only do harm for the country. As we all know that we can improve the productivity, also known as working efficiency by trading each other’s extra resources at a lower price. Admittedly that the arbitrage give people the chance to achieve specialization but also raise competition. However, competition means everything to the real growth in an ambitious nation and country. Only under the competition, the latest technology can be stimulated, and with the help of high-tech support, profits can be gain in return.
Now that we have already see the benefit from trade for the whole country, let us see more on personal decision with trade and autarky. As a utilitist, I can see no point in boycott because I am a rational person as the textbook defines. Paying more money on similiar product does not make any sense to me. In addition, the protection method such as tariff and quotas only cause deadweight loss in the end that the manipulated method to avoid trade is not working anymore. The more expensive the protected goods becomes, the less people tend to get it.
In all, there would be no other answer heard from a student in international trade but it is good for us to trade and buy stuff at a lower price regardless its country of origin.

dreamcece

A real buzzer goes against the opinions held by the reading passage that he thinks buzz is not anything the reading says.
First, the reading passage indicates that buzzers are paid to tell the lie about the products. However, the lecturer says that buzzers are only hired if they use one certain product and do really think it is worth recommendation. This is exactly the reason why the lecturer is hired as a buzzer.
Second, the reading passage suggests that people are less critical to the words from the buzzers. The lecturer opposes that the statement is definitely not true. People are tend to ask a lot of questions and gather information such as price and services about the product. Once the buzzer cannot answer those questions, the consumers are not going to buy.
Third, the reading passage mentions that the existence of buzzers dampers the trust between people, which is a totally stupid idea in the lecturer's eyes.
He objects the opinion by saying that if the buzzers are not trusted by anyone, no company would hire a buzzer. In addition, the effect of the trust issue should go adverse, for  buzzers do tell the truth. Once the consumers enjoyed the fancy benefits, they are more open to people.

小滋滋

11.2改
Intensive boycott against Japanese goods is now prevailing in several part of China due to the complex historical and political conflicts between the two countries, which raises a heated discussion about whether or not people should buy things made in their own country. Since I have learned some basic assumptions about the international trade, I do not agree with the autarky economic growth model.
According to Ricardo, the 19th century English neoclassic economist who focuses on various aspects on economic phenomenon after the industrial revolution, trade is good for every aspect of economies. In his Riparian Model, two countries with (have) similar technology and resources. Name Home country and foreign country for the two objects (没看懂)we are going to analysis. Home country can produce 10 units of rice or 20 cars, foreign country can produce 15 units of rice or 45 cars. It is not hard for us to calculate out the opportunity cost for each country to produce every one unit of rice, and it turns out that Foreign country has absolute advantage in producing both rice and cars, but Home country has comparative advantage in producing rice. Therefore if the trade should happen, Home country should specialize in producing rice, while Foreign country should produce cars. In total, the two countries can enjoy 10 units of rice and 45 cars, and under trade, each country can gain more product than they did in autarky status. Setting a reasonable world or trade price, then the two countries can all better off because their customers can enjoy more good(goods?or better?) and gain more utility, and workers can also enjoy a higher real wage because(两个because不太好，还是due to raising productivity) their productivity raises as well.
Except for the academic model for example, boycott foreign countries’ goods does not really represent patriot. Instead, the nonsense blocking out can only do harm for the country. As we all know that we can improve the productivity, also known as working efficiency by trading each other’s extra resources at a lower price. Admittedly that the arbitrage gives people the chance to achieve specialization but also raises competition. However, competition means everything to the real growth in an ambitious nation and country. Only under the competition, the latest technology can be stimulated, and with the help of high-tech support, profits can be gained in return.
Now that we have already seen the benefit from trade for the whole country, let us see more on personal decision with trade and autarky. As a utilitist, I can see no point in boycott because I am a rational person as the textbook defines. Paying more money on similar product does not make any sense to me. In addition, the protection method such as tariff and quotas only cause deadweight loss in the end that the manipulated method to avoid trade is not working anymore. The more expensive the protected goods becomes, the less people tend to get it.
In all, there would be no other answer heard from a student in international trade but it is good for us to trade and buy stuff at a lower price regardless its country of origin.

好高深，读的好晕呀，嘿嘿，和学术相关的都不太懂，就看了看语法结构错误，注意下细节，今天有好多拼写错误，加油！@@

lmylacoste

The lecturer expresses her negative attitude toward the three options mentioned in the reading passages which are focus on helping Torreya survive in Northern Florida.

The first option is to rebuild(paraphrase,好！) the Torreya in original area. However, the lecturer objects it because it is unlikely to succeed. The lecturer mentions that the microenviornment has already changed because of（because） the larger climate is differential, possibly due to either the global warming or the local drying out.

The second option suggests that move Torreya to another location（不是一句句子哦）. Nevertheless, the lecturer go（goes） against this idea by giving the outcome from another real case, the migration of Black Nocers. She says that the Black Nocers were so quickly spread that they kill a lot of originated trees, some of which were already endangered, making them distinct. The unexpected outcome appears because of the unbalance of the ecosystem.

The third option is to preserve Torreya in research centers. Nonetheless, the lecturer opposes that to resist a species for seasons（什么意思？求讨论！！！）, genetical diversity should be assured. Due to the large size of Torreya, there are no capacity to preserve a large amount of Torreya in the research centers and therefore, the option cannot preserve the Torreya to survive in a long term.

总结

用词丰富，非常好

善于用长难句，但是对于成分的判断要注意一些

写的很好，精炼的表达内容，但是字数多点会更好。

dreamcece

我用错词叻，不应该用resist，但是应该是help Torreya survive; for seasons 是想说long term的意思，不知道对不对

dreamcece

是David Ricardo的Model哦，所以叫做Ricardian Model。哥子不要盲目崇拜word自动修改哈。