包子不包子：欢迎拍砖～～

kchszy061ban

Both of the lecturer and the writer discuss about whether a painting of an elderly lady belongs to Rembrandt, who is a famous Dutch painter in the 17th century. However, the author and speaker hold the exact opposite idea in the discussion.

First, the speaker claims that the fur collar in the painting is not original, which is not a mistake made by the painter. X- Ray examines pieces of the pigment and finds the truth that it is added on the top of the original painting 100 years after the painting is（was） made. Probably by someone who wants（wanted） to increase the value of the painting by decorating it looks like a formal lady. Therefore, this directly disproves its counterpart in the reading.

Moreover, the professor contends that the supposed area of light and shadow can be explains by the fur collar. Once the collar is removed, the original color could be seen. The dress was painted by simple and light color, which reflects light that illuminates part of the lady's face. That is why the face is not partially shadow in the painting. Accordingly, in the original painting the light and shadow fits well. This is another place where experiences the contradicted theory.

At last, pieces of wood panel were added to the original painting when the collar was painted, declares the lecturer. The wood panel is enlarged at sides and on the top to make it grand and valuable, while, the original painting is finished on a single board as expected by Rembrandt. In fact, the wood of the elderly lady's panel is found to be of the same of kind of wood that used in another painting, self-portrait with a hat, of Rembrandt. Consequently, the last point is rebutted.

In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the passage and convincingly shows that the painting is indeed the work by Rembrandt.

包子的综合把握的很好了，听力的内容写的很详细，超出我的预期。

包子不包子

6月20日110827 NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Patience is usually not a good strategy. We should take action now rather than later.

With the advent of modern technologies and machines, people are forced to accelerate their daily life pace. Much more pressure often disturb people when working and studying, the effects of which is that people are tend to take action right away in order to accomplish them as soon as possible. However, personally speaking, taking action immediately is not a good strategy. We should be patient and move later.

To begin with, be patient does not mean waiting and doing nothing. On the other hand, it is a wise approach to analyze potential questions and decide whether taking action is a right choice or not. Think twice before you take action is a prevalent saying in China, which is a good reflection of my perspective. Be patient, and take all the possible situations into consideration, and later come up with solutions. Until now, it is still not late, if people want to achieve the goal perfectly. Take the easiest thing in daily life as an example: hiking with friend. On rainy days, once people take actions and go hiking with almost no preparation, it is needless to say how dangerous it is. Even they can lose their life for the immediate action. However, if wait patiently and prepare for the trip carefully, sunny days will come up sooner or later. Apparently, hiking in sunshine and with all the things under control is more enjoyable. Therefore, being patient is not wasting time. It is a wise method to prepare for the action at the right time.

Another equally important point is that people need to wait when they are processing aims. Occasionally, time is not right for actions to be taken. Farmers have to wait and not to plant anything until spring is coming. Children have to wait until the right time is coming for them to leave home and live by themselves. Even trees have to wait for the approaching of warm temperature to germinate. If people are so impatient that they do whatever they want regardless of the time. What will happen? Hard to predict. Take the most beneficial opportunities to start the journey. Good starting is half of the success. Fulfill the meaning of action is easier to access.

Some people may against to my point by stating that only weak people wait patiently for the chance to appear. Strong people take actions right way to achieve their goals or to create chances. When consider about how many people have the control over things they would like to manipulate, hardly can the statement mentioned above work.

To sum up, be patient is a method to prepare for the real action and the most suitable chance. It is a wise preparation rather than merely waiting. Consequently, patience is a good strategy.

包子不包子

6.21 综合

tpo5

Both of the writer and lecturer discuss about the usage of the 'great houses', notable buildings belongs to settlements of Chaco Canyon. The author lists three possible theories. The professor, however, declares that none of them are convincing.

First, the lecturer insists that the outside of the house may resemble the 'apartment building' at Taos, but the inside casts doubts on the residential purpose theory. If people once live in here, there should be enough fireplaces for people's daily cooking. On the contrary, not many fireplaces are found. In the largest house, only fireplaces for 10 families are discovered, though there is plenty room for 100 families. Therefore, this directly disproves its counterpart in the reading material.

Moreover, the professor contends that the evidence cannot support the theory for storage. It may sound plausible at first. When excavation work goes further, no trace of maize and maize containers are able to be found. Why in a storage there is no maize spread on the ground? The professor doubted. Accordingly, this is another place where experiences the contradicted theory.

At last the speaker asserts that the ceremonial center theory is not well supported. He explains that stuff like sand, stone and construction tools that are not expected for a ceremony are found in the material excavated. The pots could be the trash of the construction material through away after the meal of people who constructed there. Consequently, Pueblo Alto is not a good evidence and it is also disproved.

In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the passage and convincingly shows that all the competing theories aroused by the writer are incorrect.

包子不包子

6月21日110815NA One of your classmates needs help with some schoolwork. Which solution would you recommend your classmate should do: to ask you for help or to find a professional tutor for help?

Parents and teachers always say that we should feel happy when we find difficulties in our schoolwork. Indeed, it is a positive phenomenon. Once we solve the problems. No same problems can we encounter in exam. However, the question is that who should we turn to? A friend or a tutor? Personally, I would like to say that friend is a better solution, which means I suggest my classmate to come to me for help.

To begin with, friends know each other well and they understand which way to solve question is most suitable. Students spend most of their day time with friends at school. Learning, talking and playing with each other. No wonder there is a better understanding among students themselves. If my friends come to me to ask for assistance I know exactly that she is not good at calculation. So I will defiantly not use numbers and formulations to show her the solution. Instead, graphs and words is the best, which I know clearly is her favorite method to study and it will surely give her a deeper recognition of the question. In this way, by the help form a friends, students can not only gain the answer of the problem, but also a more concise understanding is provided.

Another equally important view is that students do no have to feel inconvenient and nervous when talking to a friend rather than a tutor. It is common in every school that before going to the tutors' office to seek for help, students have to wait until office hour or they should sent e-mail first to check whether the tutor is free. On the contrary, when my classmate want an answer from me, all they have to do is walking to my desk and asking whenever they want. Compared with discussing with a tutor, needless to stress how convenient it is to turn to me for help. Moreover, students often feel nervous to some extent when talking to the authorities-professional tutors. Even someone is so nervous that they forget the significant question that should be aroused at the end of the conversation. While taking to a friend like me, the last thing they should feel is nervous. Besides all kinds of question is welcome because it is also an approach of learning for myself. Furthermore, I will provide my sincere courage for my friend and support them. Accordingly, how can this not to be a better way for students to solve questions.

Others may against my point by pointing that there are questions that I am not able to answer. I do not deny that my ability is limited. However, we can discuss and ask for other students' help. The more students we turn to the higher the possibility for the question to be solved.

In conclusion, a tutor may be knowledgeable but they do not know the most suitable way for certain students to understand the question. Besides, with the convenient and comfortable feeling when talking to friends, no wonder it will be better.

kchszy061ban

蓝色为意见或建议高亮为精彩绿色为总结红色为错误

Both of the lecturer and the writer discuss the issue about whether dinosaurs are endotherms. The author lists three possible evidence to support his/her opinion about dinosaurs are endotherms. The lecturer, on the contrary, insists that all the evidence cannot prove the view holds by the writer.

First, the speaker claims that the polar region where dinosaur fossils are found is warmer than today. It is warm enough in the warm period of a year for endotherms to live, despite of their disability in controlling (maintaining)their body temperature consistently. When it is in the cold period of a year, endotherms can migrate to warmer places or hibernate like many reptiles do. Therefore, the fossils found in the polar region cannot necessarily prove the fact that dinosaurs are endotherms.

Moreover, the speaker asserts that the legs underneath dinosaurs body cannot necessarily explain that dinosaurs are high energy consuming endotherms build for running, which means there is a connection between dinosaurs’ movement and their body structure. With the legs under their body, more weight can be supported. So they can grow to large size. Being large in size has advantages for dinosaurs. No need to focus on that the physical movement of dinosaurs is limited by the legs-under-body structure. Consequently, this directly disproves its counterpart in the reading material.

At last the professor contends that the growing ring discovered in the bones of dinosaurs exhibits that dinosaurs are not rapidly growing like endotherms do. They living in a pattern-growing quickly in warm time, stop or slow growing in cold time and start growing in warm time again. Furthermore, this characteristic is known as not belong to endotherms. Accordingly, this is another place experiences the contradicted theory.

To sum up, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the passage and convincingly shows that the main idea of the reading material, dinosaurs are endotherms, is incorrect.

包子的综合很熟练了，木有大错，逻辑清晰。

雅宝2011

包子同学，是你改我的么？还是再需要我再改一遍你的呢？我刚贴上去620的独立，发现你621的都写完了，顿时很羞愧啊。

想问：占哪天的作文，当天是不是就要交了，然后当天分的那个组，是要求队友在第二天22点之前改的？！

包子不包子

包子同学，是你改我的么？还是再需要我再改一遍你的呢？我刚贴上去620的独立，发现你621的都写完了，顿时很羞愧啊。

想问：占哪天的作文，当天是不是就要交了，然后当天分的那个组，是要求队友在第二天22点之前改的？！

-- by 会员 雅宝2011 (2012/6/21 18:58:43)

6.20咱们互改
当天的每天十点前贴上就好修改在第二天十点前完成
雅宝说的没错
马上改你20的去~

包子不包子

6.22综合

Tpo6

Both of the lecturer and speaker explore the issue about communal online encyclopedia. The writer believes that there are problems about it. The professor, on the contrary, insists that the reasons mentioned by the author is a small price to pay for what it does offer, and it is prejudice to ignore how far it has come.

First, the speaker declare that errors cannot be find completely disappeared from the encyclopedia either on or off line, which means for traditional encyclopedia it has never been closely accurate. The point is that, describes the professor, errors online are easy to be corrected. However, in traditional encyclopedia, printed book, errors may remain for decades. Therefore, this directly disproves its counterpart in the reading material.

Moreover, the speaker claims that editors for online encyclopedias have already realized the importance to protect the encyclopedia from hacking. Here are some strategies: put the crucial fact in read only format, which indicates that no changes can be made to these words and the reliability is ensured. Furthermore, there are special editor whose job is to monitor all the changes in the articles and eliminate the unbelievable changes. Accordingly, this is another point where experienced the contradicted theory.

At last, the speaker asserts that traditional encyclopedia is not able to reflect users' interests because of the limited space. It is editors who decide what is important and what is not, which is not a issue for online dictionary. On the contrary, there are academic articles and diversity topics online in the encyclopedia that reflects the readers' interests. Besides, the great diversity is one of its greatest advantages. Consequently, the last point is rebutted.

In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the passage and convincingly shows that the view hold by the writer is incorrect.

包子不包子

6月22日100619 NA If you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, you will use e-mail or text messaging, OR use the telephone or voice-messaging.

People encounter all kinds of problems in work and study. Sometimes there is such a dilemma that no words can be said by ourselves directly, or people merely do not want to communicate with anger, which can easily hurt others' feelings, or by voice the situation cannot be fully explained. Therefore, personally, I prefer to use e-mail or text messaging to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others.

To begin with, when discussing on the telephone like face to face talking, not much time are accessible for people to mediate and clarify clearly. People I admire most is debater. Clearly convey of the topic, fully develop of the truth and wonderful control of the intonation, all these elements are performed perfectly by the debaters in a limited amount of time. No wonder how difficult it is to manipulate. For me it seems impossible, when I am discussing, things always go to worse. Time is usually not enough for me in discussion, I have to consider about my main idea, vocabulary and all the related stuff, which is a rush. Therefore, I chose e- mail and text messaging to discuss about upsetting or controversial problems, by which I can write as long as I want to express myself precisely.

Another equally important point is that people do not talk plainly. Instead, there are intonations and feelings in our voice, which may indicate the talker's emotion and lead to the uncomfortable of the other, especially when discussing upsetting and controversial problems. Once I was arguing with my mother on the phone about whether I should live in the dorm at school, which was the last thing I want to do. I tried to defense myself so emotionally that I even cannot remember what did I say hurt my mother deeply. I am regret indeed. Until now, I still keep telling myself what if I did not talk on the phone？ What if I sent a message？ Maybe things are possible to change greatly. Consequently, I insist to discuss by e-mail or text messaging.

Some people may argue that text message is not efficient. People will miss important information if they ignore one tiny message. In this way telephone conversation is of significant needed. I do not deny the existence of some situation that text message do not help at all. However, if people want to reach the conclusion peacefully and clearly, text messaging and e-mail is the better choice.

In conclusion, by text messaging and e- mail people can avoid unnecessary conflict and the accuracy of sentences can be increased.

DanielleZ

6.21 修改One of your classmates needs help with some schoolwork. Which solutionwould you recommend your classmate should do: to ask you for help or to find aprofessional tutor for help?
Parents andteachers always say that we should feel happy when we find difficulties in ourschoolwork. Indeed, it is a positive phenomenon. Once we solve the problems. Nosame problems can we encounter in exam. However, the question is that whoshould we turn to, A friend or a tutor? Personally, I would liketo say that friend(gettinghelp from friends) is a bettersolution, which means I suggest my classmate to come to me for help.

To begin with, friends know each other well andthey understand which way to solve question is most suitable. Students spendmost of their day time with friends at school. Learning, talking and playingwith each other. No wonder there is a better understanding among studentsthemselves. If my friends(前后主语不一致，用friend..而且我觉得这句话可以说成定语从句,简洁一些：if myfriend who is not good at calculation comes to me to ask for assistance ) come to me to ask for assistance I know exactlythat she is not good at calculation. So I will defiantly not use numbers andformulations to show her the solution. Instead, graphs and words is the best,which I know clearly is her favorite method to study and it willsurely give her a deeper recognition of the question. In this way, by the helping form a friends(friend), students can not only gain the answerof the problem, but also a more concise understanding is provided.

Another equally important view is that students dono(not) have to feel inconvenient and nervous whentalking to a friend rather than a tutor. It is common in every school thatbefore going to the tutors' office to seek for help, students have to waituntil office hour or they should sent e-mail first to check whether the tutoris free. On the contrary, when my classmate want an answer from me, all they have(建议换成need)to do is walking to my desk and asking whenever they want. Compared withdiscussing with a tutor, needless to stress how convenient it is to turn to mefor help. Moreover, students often feel nervous to some extent when talking to the authorities-professional tutors. Even someoneis so nervous that they forget the significant question that should be aroused(arisen) at the end of the conversation. Whiletaking to a friend like me, the last thing they should feel is nervous. Besidesall kinds of question is welcome because it is also an approach of learning formyself. Furthermore, I will provide my sincere courage for my friend andsupport them. Accordingly, howcan this not to be a better way for students to solve questions.

Others may against my point by pointing that thereare some(建议加个some)questions that I am not able to answer.I do not deny that my ability is limited. However, we can discuss and ask forother students' help. Themore students we turn to the higher the possibility for the question to besolved.

In conclusion, a tutor may be knowledgeable butthey do not know the most suitable way for certain students to understand thequestion. Besides, with the convenient and comfortable feeling when talking tofriends, no wonder it will be better.