ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: blueshandy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教大全95

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-3-26 23:43:00 | 只看该作者

我觉的不存在什么拟人不拟人的问题

在逻辑许可的情况下,主动优先被动,分词优先从句

12#
发表于 2005-3-27 02:16:00 | 只看该作者

但是OG里面关于can,afford,bring about的例子里面解释都说不可以让物执行动作啊?!

31. Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, there is a disinclination on the part of many people to recognize the degree to which their analytical skills are weak.

(A)  Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, there is a disinclination on the part of many people to recognize the degree to which their analytical skills are weak.

(B)  Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, which they admit they lack, many people are disinclined to recognize that their analytical skills are weak.

(C)  Unlike computer skills or other technical skills, analytical skills bring out a disinclination in many people to recognize that they are weak to a degree.

(D)  Many people, willing to admit that they lack computer skills or other technical skills, are disinclined to recognize that their analytical skills are weak.

(E)   Many people have a disinclination to recognize the weakness of their analytical skills while willing to admit their lack of computer skills or other technical skills.

Choice D is best. Choice A illogically compares skills to a disinclination; choice B compares skills to many people. Choice C makes the comparison logical by casting analytical skills as the subject of the sentence, but it is awkward and unidiomatic to say skills bring out a disinclination. Also in C, the referent of they is unclear, and weak to a degree changes the meaning of the original statement. In E, have a disinclination... while willing is grammatically incomplete, and admit their lack should be admit to their lack. By making people the subject of the sen­tence, D best expresses the intended contrast, which pertains not so much to skills as to people's willingness to recognize different areas of weakness.

其它的例子就不帖了,大同小异,MM觉得原因何在呢?

谢谢!

13#
发表于 2005-3-27 06:07:00 | 只看该作者
抽象名词作主语在OG中俯拾皆是。如:og13 (rates are forcing cutbacks), og52 (costs have created an opportunity), og144 (efforts have not reduced)。能不能用作主语,关键看它是不是动作的主体或施动者。象大全95,开支减少的原因就是机械化,所以B对。E用被动were cut,没有说明机械化和开支减少的cause-effect关系,所以不如B好。你举的og31的例子,分析技术和不愿意承认没有这种关系,所以错。
14#
发表于 2005-3-27 11:23:00 | 只看该作者

66. The Federal Reserve Board's reduction of interest rates on loans to financial institutions is both an acknowledgment of past economic trends and an effort to influence their future direction.

(A)  reduction of interest rates on loans to financial institutions is both an acknowledgment of past economic trends and an effort

(B)   reduction of interest rates on loans to financial institutions is an acknowledgment both of past economic trends as well as an effort

(C)  reduction of interest rates on loans to financial institutions both acknowledge past economic trends and attempt

(D)  reducing interest rates on loans to financial institutions is an acknowledgment both of past economic trends and an effort

(E)   reducing interest rates on loans to financial institutions both acknowledge past economic trends as well as attempt

Choice A is best. In B, both must come before acknowledg­ment if it is to link acknowledgment and effort; as misplaced here, it creates the unfulfilled expectation that the reduction of interest rates will be an acknowledgment of two different things. Moreover, both... as well as ... is redundant: the correct idiom is both x and y. In C, the plural verbs acknowl­edge and attempt do not agree with their singular subject, reduction; also, it is imprecise to characterize a reduction as performing actions such as acknowledging or attempting. In both D and E, the use of the participle reducing rather than the noun reduction is awkward. Like B, D misplaces both, while E repeats both the redundancy of B and the agreement error of C.

楼上说的是, 是我糊涂了.

但是OG31的那句 but it is awkward and unidiomatic to say skills bring out a disinclination.,和上面那题的红字部分如何理解呢?

感觉对于某些动词的使用还是有倾向的?!

不知道大家认为如何?

15#
发表于 2005-3-28 02:07:00 | 只看该作者
up!
16#
发表于 2005-3-29 06:48:00 | 只看该作者
help!
17#
发表于 2005-3-29 23:37:00 | 只看该作者

Help!

18#
发表于 2005-3-30 12:14:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得没有你说的动词使用倾向。就是有,也没有必要去记。拿到任何一个句子,只要看看主语是不是动词动作的发出者就行了。


如:analytical skills bring out a disinclination,和原来意思:人们不愿意承认自己分析技术差,体会一下, 分析技术能发出这个bring out a disinclination的动作吗?来两句汉语的句子吧:她不愿意承认爱你<=>爱带来了她对你的不愿意承认。怎么样?awkward且unidiomatic吧?是不愿意承认,没的事。


OG66,一看就知道reduction, acknowledgement, effort, attempt都是FRB的事,动作发出者当然就只能是FRB了,reduction能成为动作的发出者吗?


我的结论:没有天生就不能作主语的名词,也没有天生就要人陪的动词,只有在错误的地点错误地呆在一起的名词和动词。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-30 13:24:21编辑过]
19#
发表于 2005-3-30 12:59:00 | 只看该作者

经典,感谢!

20#
发表于 2005-12-18 07:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用blueshandy在2005-3-15 22:46:00的发言:

Although some officials noted that using machines for farming in China costs more than traditional hand cultivation,the mechanization of farming in the village of longBow doubled the corn yield while the previous year's costs were cut in half.


B  mechanization of farming in the village of LongBow doubled the corn yield while cutting costs to half those of the previous year


E  farming mechanization in the billage of Long Bow doubled the corn yield while costs were cut to half that of the previous year


我选了E,可是答案是B。我知道应该是mechanizaiton of farming 和farming mechanization的区别,可是,我不清楚真正的意思是什么?哪位大牛不吝赐教。


通读了一遍贴子,LZ的问题好像好是没有解决;大全95的相关贴子也都看了,没有希望的答案。

哪位路过,再给解释两句?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 07:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部