请教OG第14题，关于correspondingly的修饰问题

蓝色大门

题目如下：
Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly bv increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead

问题：为什么A选项不对呢？曼哈顿的解释说correspondingly没有可修饰的对象，它不可以修饰unaccompanied或not accompanied么？

benjaminsandro

A错在when不能引导条件，只能引导时间吧。

蓝色大门

benjaminsandro 发表于 2015-4-12 13:22
A错在when不能引导条件，只能引导时间吧。

我查了一下曼哈顿的解释，when可以引导条件状语从句的唉。。。。

蓝色大门

自己顶一下。有哪位大牛可以帮忙解释一下么？

kiwifoodtown

LZ，如果如你所讲，correspondingly 可以修饰unaccompanied的话，那你觉的逻辑意思还讲的通吗？既然讲不通，这种修饰还成立吗？

michellerao11

correspondingly 是副词，相对地，对应地
翻译成：相对地 not accompanied， 就很weird。

Hiiragihane

应该corresponding修饰increase而不是correspondingly修饰accompany

yeye523

你注意句意，这句话意思是说Rising invertories需要相应的increase in sales, 否则会导致production cutbacks. 所以correspondingly从句意理解是修饰increase的，修饰unaccompanied不合逻辑，没有correspondingly unaccompanied这种说法。