- UID
- 988424
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2014-3-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
maxime0224 发表于 2015-4-13 12:38
把这么好的回复顶上来!!
没错,严重赞成20L。。。在法国做Risk, Quant之类的 一个工程师院校的硕士文凭 ...
from the view of science and engineering (and thus those now working in risk and quant)
those (99.99%) from business school and program only are weak in maths (and programming), and only know to "blow water".
They are kept away from any core modelling stuffs, and will better go to do presentation and drink with clients.
as they techniques are not solid enough, their mindset are not analytical enough, ..........
and LBS, INSEAD, HEC all counts as so.........unless one have a solid enough education before
(MBA is kind of a minus for a solid quantitative modeling job indeed.....)
of course one may go for the non-quantitative, but more regulatory side for risk.........but as OP have an engineering background, it is much easier to go on the quant side rather than the legal side (which again will like someone with a legal background instead a pure business one)
P.S.1 indeed if one did some research into quantitative finance program, most of the good one over the world are hosted by math/stat , or OR department,
but not the business school (except UCB maybe also UCLA........CMU also but CMU is a tech school, and except Warwick which have a strong math department too)
P.S.2 myabe bit too late, but i really doubt the decision that OP is target are 行研 and risk management together.......as a experienced professional, OP should be knowledgeable enough to choose in advance as the education preparation for them is kind of different..... |
|