lsat-3-4-16

icyeye

16. Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.

Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.

In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?

(A) Accepts Concetta’s criterion and then ads evidence to concetta’s case

(B) Discredits Concetta’s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence

(C) Rejects Concetta’s criterion and then disputes a specific claim

(D) Disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative criterion

(E) Attacks one of Concetta’s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argument

我选了d，因为conclusion就是Franchot was a great writer，后一个人不是对此进行了驳斥吗？但怎么错了呢？我知道两者的标准不同，但是d为什么不对呢?

dphxmg

Anwer D 的前半部分重复了问题 （In his disagreement with Concetta）, 明显是废话。

至于伟大作家标准则是个见仁见智的问题，it is allowed to be subjectively judged. 所以，这不是个事实。

至于是否F做到未卜先知，恐怕就只有文学史家才知道喽。

所以D一看就长得不像良民。

答案C与Alicia的话简直就是绝配。我们不选他还选谁。

icyeye

我还听听其他牛牛们的讨论意见。

“Anwer D 的前半部分重复了问题 （In his disagreement with Concetta）, 明显是废话”，这点我觉得有道理，但后面的说法我觉得我太信服。

lawyer_1

A提出伟大作家的新标准（the ability to move people ），但并没有就该标准提出证据，而是质疑C的CLAIM（was ahead of her time in understanding）。所以C对，D错