ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5327|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[Helr题库] OG SC 128题 千行语法最后一栏求解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-1-11 15:24:47 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.

(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved



千行excel 该题最后一栏写道:
C选项引申的这个知识点才是王道!
first off, the construction (preposition) + NOUN + VERBing is WRONG, unless the preposition refers directly to the NOUN. (that isn't usually the case, so, if you're in doubt, you should strike choices with this sort of construction.)

for instance:
i've never heard of bees stinging dogs
WRONG. this is not an issue of whether you've heard of bees themselves; it's an issue of whether you've heard of their stinging dogs.

...results in the act of stinging causing...
WRONG. this doesn't result in the act of stinging itself; it results in what is caused by the act of stinging.

i have a picture of my cousin playing hockey.
CORRECT. this time, the picture is actually of my cousin, so we're good.



想请教粗体标出的介词是结构中所指的介词吗?   这个结构具体怎么理解?读来读去都似懂非懂的样子。

谢谢!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2015-1-11 18:34:42 | 只看该作者
是的。这个结构的意思是,不能用NOUN + VERBing来表示一个发生的动作,因为NOUN + VERBing实际上就相当于一个名词。
VERBing是作为Noun-modifer修饰Noun,实际上这个结构就相当于 (preposition)+ Noun的结构。

原题:
Australian embryologists have found evidence to suggest ...
found evidence to suggest 表示这些证据可以用来表明...,但是用found evidence suggesting 只能说明找到了一些证据,后面都是修饰这个证据。

例1: i've never heard of bees stinging dogs.
heard of bees + [stinging dogs.] 听到蜜蜂,不对,应该是一个完整的动作。

例2:...results in the act of stinging causing...
result in the act of stinging,导致一个蜇的动作,不对。应该是导致蜇会产生什么后果。
***注意 逗号+resulting in 结构都错,原因同理。

例3:i have a picture of my cousin playing hockey.
a picture of my cousin,对,一个关于我表弟的画,表弟在玩hockey.

不知你是否清楚了点?

另外,弱弱的问一句你下的哪个版本的千行呀这么详细。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2015-1-11 21:29:35 | 只看该作者
287151319 发表于 2015-1-11 18:34
是的。这个结构的意思是,不能用NOUN + VERBing来表示一个发生的动作,因为NOUN + VERBing实际上就相当于一 ...

嗯嗯 清楚多了 谢谢了~!!


我下载的千行excel是这个版本哈~~http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-887995-1-1.html
地板
发表于 2015-7-31 21:47:46 | 只看该作者
谢谢!!!
5#
发表于 2016-2-22 02:47:33 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
6#
发表于 2017-2-20 22:28:38 | 只看该作者
重点是elephant had descended错了,用过去完成时的话除非你承认elephant代表过去时即灭绝了,现在elephant还存在所以不能用过去完成时
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 01:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部