ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1451|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] SC中关于modifier的一道题目 题目

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-1-5 00:16:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
题目如下:

Known to its considerable opposition as "Seward's Folly", the purchase of Alaska was not unlike that of the Louisiana territory, which provided the United States with new land, a strategic military position, and control of the entire Mississippi River valley.

(A) not unlike that of the Louisiana territory, which provided
(B) not unlike the Louisiana territory, which provided
(C) like the Louisiana territory, which provided
(D) like that of the Louisiana territory for providing
(E) as that of the Louisiana territory for providing

答案选A ,因为D“for providing"不知带是指purchase of Alaska 还是 that of Louisiana。
但是我觉得“for providing"紧跟that of Louisiana ,难道是不是修饰他的吗?
还有"which provided"之前为什么要有逗号,我怎么觉得逗号反而使得"which"指向了purchase of Alaska

求高手解答,谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2015-1-5 00:34:38 | 只看该作者
the purchase of Alaska was like that of the Louisiana territory for providing the United States with new land, a strategic military position, and control of the entire Mississippi River valley.
如果这样,for providing表示原因就修饰的是the purchase of Alaska为什么像that of the Louisiana territory的原因,表意错误。

which引导非限定修饰,用逗号隔开,建议看看mahattan sc 5th
板凳
发表于 2015-3-30 15:32:04 | 只看该作者
D是一定不对的,the purchase of Alaska 与the purchase of Lousiana 相似点,就control of Mississippi River Valley, 是不可能的。D可以理解为,购买Alaska也为美国提供了 密西西比河谷的控制权,但Alaska离开Mississippi river十万八千里呐;在此,provide 后面的内容,仅用于形容Louisiana ,不容易引起misunderstanding.
拙见,有错请包涵。

PS ,
not unlike 是否有双重否定,表强烈肯定,如果改了改变了语义强烈度?请指教~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 00:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部