ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2712|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep题目关于less和lower 的问题 搜了一些帖子无果,看了RON神的解释貌似更迷茫~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-10-1 19:50:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
70. Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly less than they did in the year that ended in the previous quarter.
A, less than they did
B, less than it did
C, less than they were
D, lower than
E, lower than they were

关于Manhattan中RON对于less 的解释如下:
"lower" cannot be used with countable things.
in general, i can only think of three types of nouns for which you can use "lower" as a quantifier:
1/ mathematical quantities (things that can be represented by actual numbers)
e.g.
this number is lower than that other number
this percentage is lower than that other percentage (文中比较的是2.8percent 和现在的percent,岂不是符合了文中用lower???)
this interest rate is lower than that other interest rate
... so, note that one amount of money can be "lower" than another amount of money.
2/ abstract ideas that aren't necessarily numbers, but that can be thought of as somewhat quantitative (i.e., you can conceptualize the idea of "more" or "less" for these things, even though you can't assign numbers to them)
e.g.
i hold Jim in lower esteem than i hold his brother.
these tasks have lower priority than those other tasks
3/ things that are literally (= physically) lower than other things
e.g.
the elevation of Medellín is lower than that of Bogotá
the ceiling in my new apartment is lower than the one in my old house
under no circumstances can a countable plural noun be "lower" than another countable plural noun, unless you are referring to differences in physical height (e.g., my ceilings are lower than yours -- this means that they are physically closer to the ground, not that there are fewer of them!)

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2014-10-1 22:20:19 | 只看该作者
顶。。。。。。。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-10-2 22:15:28 | 只看该作者
有人么~~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2014-10-3 22:18:36 | 只看该作者
啦啦啦。。。。。。。。。。
5#
发表于 2014-10-21 11:19:45 | 只看该作者
文中比较的实际是costs rose 2.8%, 和 costs rose less than 2.8%
lower 是形容词,无法修饰rose, 因此无法说 lower than they did
less  可以是形容词,也可以是副词,因此可以说 less than they did
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-10-21 13:23:43 | 只看该作者
courage2002 发表于 2014-10-21 11:19
文中比较的实际是costs rose 2.8%, 和 costs rose less than 2.8%
lower 是形容词,无法修饰rose, 因此无法 ...

这么久之前的帖子==谢谢回复~

我现在又看了一遍,做了一点分析看看对不对哈~

首先,were前面没有可以对应的内容所以CE错;如果没有were 或是did 的话比较对象就是in the year明显不对;然后因为是costs所以是they。==
7#
发表于 2016-10-28 12:20:18 | 只看该作者
sunyuwei 发表于 2014-10-3 22:18
啦啦啦。。。。。。。。。。

同意!               
8#
发表于 2016-10-28 12:20:50 | 只看该作者
courage2002 发表于 2014-10-21 11:19
文中比较的实际是costs rose 2.8%, 和 costs rose less than 2.8%
lower 是形容词,无法修饰rose, 因此无法 ...

同意!               
9#
发表于 2016-10-29 23:59:05 | 只看该作者
想请问一下这里的costs是不可数吗?答案可否用fewer than代替?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 19:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部