OG 13 104题 彻底混乱了 麻烦大神出手相救在此谢过

sunyuwei

104. Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on
her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives,

(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating
them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully
coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix
Potter, in her book illustrations

(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinated them with her narratives and

关于A 选项，会产生coordinating 修饰illustrastrasions 的歧义，但是我认为 in her book illustrations作为插入语根本可以删去不看，怎么会有歧义？同样B选项In her book illustrations是个状语，但是这貌似是什么夹心修饰。。不太清楚。E选项中OG说The participial phrase does not clearly modify book illustrations;这里的coordinated 是动词吧？就算有问题也是讲coordinate作为动词与captalize 并列改变原意，所以OG 的解释不清楚了

sunyuwei

ding..............

sunyuwei

顶。。。。

bigfatwhiterabb

楼主把你认为的插入语去掉，看看them怎么指代。变成无所指了。

sunyuwei

bigfatwhiterabb 发表于 2014-9-20 00:57
楼主把你认为的插入语去掉，看看them怎么指代。变成无所指了。

我是这么想的，不知道哪里有问题：

Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
当看them 指代的时候，因为前面只有一个复数名词所以指代的只能是illustrations，因而不能去掉看。但是看coordinating 的时候，不能看到分词前面的逗号就把他当做作状语的成分，前面不是一个完整的句子所以其实coordinating 作的是一个定语的成分，此时我就考虑因为有两个逗号把中间那部分插入语去掉。

不过其实转个念头想想，为了表达的更明确明显吧in her book illustration 放前面比较好，让coordinating 直接跟在B P 后面

旺财财

这也是个老早争议的题目了
B选项--夹心修饰在语法上是有问题的。不明确ambiguity而且逻辑混乱。
如果修饰前面的book illustrations，那么book illustrations能发出COORDINATE么？

再看后面，这里有个analogy。
我们可以说：
Slipping on the ice, I hurt my ankle.
但不能说：
On the playground, slipping on the ice, I hurt my ankle.  
这个句子"slipping ..."到底是跟着前面的"playground"还是跟着后面的"I hurt my ankle"？所以很awkward.
如果是跟着后面的"I hurt my ankle"，那么就是
adverbial modifier #1, adverbial modifier #2, main clause.
你有见着两个同时修饰同一个句子的adverbial modifiers就那么用逗号串联么？


再看A, them 在指代什么？只能是illustrations，可偏偏这里它在插入语里面。、
而这里偏偏用了VING modifier，那么这个VING是谁发出的，只能是BP
一个结构打破了两个层面，你有见过这种用法么。
（coordinating---BP发出： them指代另一个modifier的illustrations ）
这也是错的~~
++之
如果不看插入语这个句子就fragment了~~后面capitalized on
her keen observation and love of the natural world.孤零零的。

sunyuwei

旺财财 发表于 2014-9-20 22:56
这也是个老早争议的题目了
B选项--夹心修饰在语法上是有问题的。不明确ambiguity而且逻辑混乱。
如果修饰前 ...

明白了，谢谢指点

sunyuwei

旺财财 发表于 2014-9-20 22:56
这也是个老早争议的题目了
B选项--夹心修饰在语法上是有问题的。不明确ambiguity而且逻辑混乱。
如果修饰前 ...

NN在问你个问题，下面是Manhattan的原文，红字部分是我的困惑，又来麻烦你了哈

if the focus of the construction is the ACTION, then you must use the POSSESSIVE form for the noun/pronoun preceding the "-ing" participle. since that's fatally awkward to say in words, I'll provide an example: 
everyone laughed at me accidentally walking into the girls' bathroom --> WRONG.
sorry. this sentence would actually mean that everyone laughed at me as they were walking into the girls' bathroom. （我认为这句话错误的表达了大家是在嘲笑我而不是嘲笑我这件事，但是再怎么说walking into修饰的是me 吧？怎么能说actually mean that everyone laughed at me as they were walking into the girls' bathroom. ？这样的话需要comma了吧？）
everyone laughed at my accidentally walking into the girls' bathroom --> CORRECT, because it's the action (my walking into the bathroom, not really me) that they're laughing at.
incidentally, if the focus of the construction is the NOUN (or pronoun) itself, then you don't use a possessive. for instance: 
i saw him walking down the street --> correct, because it was him i saw, not his walking action. this sentence is, however, ambiguous, because either he or i may have been the one walking down the street. （walking 修饰的应该是him吧。。。？）
i saw his walking down the street.-- wouldn't be incorrect, but it would be a bit strange, unless I'm a modeling scout who actually analyzes the gait of random strangers as they walk down the street

daybreakhan

看一下！               

sunshj404

感谢分享！