SC问题，请大神解答 万分感谢

sunyuwei

After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States

finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the

decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.

(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of

the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and

(B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the

decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from

(C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years

of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from

(D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last

three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and

(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the

decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and

习惯用语-介词，increase to 是固定搭配，increase up to 是错误的，up 多余，应该去掉。

逻辑表达，现在分词结构在句尾可作定语修饰紧临的名词，也可作状语修饰整个句子，所以在这种情

         况下需要特别注意，通常优先作定语修饰名词，如果不符合逻辑，则是作状语修饰句子，如果二

         者都能理解符合逻辑，则说明该分词结构有修饰歧义。现在分词结构increasing有作定语就近修饰diplomas的歧义

解释对吗？优先作定语修饰名词？另外，如上所说，若都符合逻辑，则判定为歧义，那“优先”这个说法有什么意义？

请大神解答下，谢谢

旺财财

说实话没太看懂你的问题。猜一下，“合乎逻辑”=双重解读？
优先是指通常情况~~没有comma时候习惯作定语修饰名词~~
有comma一般是adv~修饰句子

sunyuwei

旺财财 发表于 2014-9-10 23:34
说实话没太看懂你的问题。猜一下，“合乎逻辑”=双重解读？
优先是指通常情况~~没有comma时候习惯作定语修 ...

没有逗号的情况优先作定语修饰名词，有逗号的情况优先作状语修饰句子。可是在如上的分析中分析当分词修饰作定语和状语都可以接受时判定为歧义。所以在判定歧义的时候我有一些不明白，也就是说能麻烦你说一下看到分词修饰的时候该怎么分析吗？流程是怎么样的？
我的判定方法是这样：首先看逻辑上根据句意理解判断分词作的是状语还是定语，修饰的是一哪部分（是前句动作发出者发出的动作还是临近的名词），再考虑语法上。若有逗号优先考虑作状语，看看可不可以作为伴随，若不行（可能存在既不能同时发生作伴随动作后不是直接结果作伴随结果的可能性），作定语再看看二者是否一致。Eg.有逗号的前提下若一道题经判断是应该作定语修饰前面的名词，则看看作状语是否符合（因为有逗号的情况下优先作状语）。若这种情况下可以做状语则修饰成分做状语，则不做定语（因为有逗号的情况下优先作状语），表明存在歧义。无逗号，同理。或者出现在逻辑判断时就无法判断修饰的是哪一部分，即做两种修饰的时候都满足句意存在修饰不清。
有点长，麻烦你看一下。真的是万分感谢！！！

旺财财

sunyuwei 发表于 2014-9-11 13:08
没有逗号的情况优先作定语修饰名词，有逗号的情况优先作状语修饰句子。可是在如上的分析中分析当分词修饰 ...

晕了。这么大一段
- -

sunyuwei

旺财财 发表于 2014-9-11 23:49
晕了。这么大一段
- -

那啥， 简而言之就是怎么判断作定语和状语歧义啊？如果两个成分都可以做就歧义？那优先作什么成分有什么用啊？
谢谢解答了亲

旺财财

sunyuwei 发表于 2014-9-12 09:40
那啥， 简而言之就是怎么判断作定语和状语歧义啊？如果两个成分都可以做就歧义？那优先作什么成分有什么 ...

我真心看着晕
你就记着一般
没有comma +ving是修饰前面的noun
有comma加ving是做状语修饰preceding clause~~~
特殊情况是有comma但是前面只有一个noun所以就只能修饰那个noun~~~
具体问题你还的拿题说话，空套理论没有用

sunyuwei

旺财财 发表于 2014-9-12 20:13
我真心看着晕
你就记着一般
没有comma +ving是修饰前面的noun

嗯 记着了
有一道题目我现在找不到了
就是clause+comma+ing 经过判断可以做状语伴随 题意确实也符合 但是答案说存在修饰clause 中宾语的歧义 我想说不是优先作状语了吗？为什么还要考虑作定语？

旺财财

sunyuwei 发表于 2014-9-12 20:32
嗯 记着了
有一道题目我现在找不到了
就是clause+comma+ing 经过判断可以做状语伴随 题意确实也符合  ...

那的跟题分析，语言是很灵活的没有一成不变的东西，找到题了随时回来分享，一起探讨

sunyuwei

旺财财 发表于 2014-9-12 21:45
那的跟题分析，语言是很灵活的没有一成不变的东西，找到题了随时回来分享，一起探讨 ...

好哒好哒

sunyuwei

旺财财 发表于 2014-9-12 21:45
那的跟题分析，语言是很灵活的没有一成不变的东西，找到题了随时回来分享，一起探讨 ...

我找到了一道ing 修饰的题目 发现还是有点问题 一起看看呗
Data gathered by weather satellites has been analyzed by scientists, reporting that the Earth’s northern latitudes have become about ten percent greener since 1980, due to more vigorous plant growth associated with warmer temperatures and higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
A.Data gathered by weather satellites has been analyzed by scientists, reporting that the Earth’s northern latitudes have
B.Data gathered by weather satellites has been analyzed by scientists, and they report the Earth’s northern latitudes as having
C.After analyzing data gathered by weather satellites, scientists report that the Earth’s northern latitudes have
D.After analysis of data, gathered by weather satellites, scientists report the Earth’s northern latitudes as having
E.After data gathered by weather satellites was analyzed by scientists, who report that the Earth’s northern latitudes have

看一下A选项，我首先考虑reporting 做状语。作伴随动作同时发生的时候逻辑主语是data，但是data has been所以不可能作伴随动作。如果作伴随结果，不需要考虑逻辑主语，但是从逻辑上看，不可能作伴随结果。所以，我觉得reporting是作定语修饰scientist.但是笔记里说“A.在题目中如果能用主动语态的情况尽量不用被动；后面分词的逻辑主语不对;”这我就疑惑了。。。可以解答下吗