ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1849|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] 请教OG的一道SC

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-8-17 12:36:27 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but bv the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.

(A) a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing
(B) a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing
(C) a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written
(D) which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing
(E) which occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written

这道题答案应该选择B,不过我对D有疑问。照理来说,D应该也算平行吧?那为什么不对呢?
那要是想平行的话,D应该怎样改写才算对呢?

请教
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-8-17 14:34:59 | 只看该作者
D的错误不在于平行不平行,在于which指代的东西不明。drugs不能occur。
板凳
发表于 2014-8-17 16:06:45 | 只看该作者
GMAT里的风险结构:SVO,which。这里的which不是指代整句话,而是指代前面的名词,D里的which指代drugs,将DRUGS带入语句明显错误
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-17 22:04:33 | 只看该作者
受教:)!!!
所以说基本在所有情况下,都是Manhattan里面的touch rule就是说which肯定都是最近修饰的吗?~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 02:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部