ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2355|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] 请大神讲解关系代词的TOUCH原则的例外

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-8-3 16:23:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG13-SC-29

Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

(A) Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering
(B) Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
(C) Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E) Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber


正确答案是E,但是如果是E的话,which的先行词是letters,中间间隔了“to Susan Huntington Dickinson”,这样是不是违背了TOUCH原则。
Manhattan中的TOUCH原则例外一共有四个(manhattan SC 5th P238),但是并不包括这一个,这个怎么解释呢?
1.A “mission-critical” modifier falls between. This modifier is often an "Of-phrase"that defines the none.The less important modifier refers to the noun plus the first modifier.
   RIGHT:He had a way OF DODGING OPPONENTS that impresses the scouts.
2.A very short predicate falls between, shifting a very long modofier back.
3.A short non-essential phrase intervenes and is set off by commas.
4.The modifier is part of parallel modifiers, one of which touches the noun.


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-8-4 09:10:36 | 只看该作者
非NN。说一下自己的看法。
1.这个to SHD(人名)是介词短语作后置定语,这个词组的core还是letters,所以用which并没有错。其实这一点和你说的“mission-critical”的例子有些相同。为什么that不是修饰opponents的呢?因为of doding opponents是来修饰a way的,这也是gmat考试里常见的干扰项。我觉得做gmat不单单要从语法的角度看,也要从语义的角度看。
2.gmat语法里,which不能用来修饰人,只能指代物
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-4 12:46:23 | 只看该作者
jackhzy521 发表于 2014-8-4 09:10
非NN。说一下自己的看法。
1.这个to SHD(人名)是介词短语作后置定语,这个词组的core还是letters,所以用 ...

太感谢了,对啊,我怎么没有想起来,which只能指物,不能指人
地板
发表于 2014-8-4 17:10:02 | 只看该作者
Manhattan Page238 1. A "mission-critical" modifier falls between. 楼主看下后面的例子。
He had a way of dodging opponents that impressed the scouts.
that从句修饰的是a way of dodging opponents,同理Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-5 08:18:56 | 只看该作者
Amber.C 发表于 2014-8-4 17:10
Manhattan Page238 1. A "mission-critical" modifier falls between. 楼主看下后面的例子。
He had a way  ...

我明白你说的意思,可是我第一次做的时候,直接把这个排除,这个是比较特殊,但是有了一个of,已经够例外的,现在又来一个to,比较纠结
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-22 16:58:23 | 只看该作者
关于这道题目,今天看到了RON大神的一段非常的经典的论述,in our observation, the gmat has been VERY goodabout this.
whenever i've seen a "which" thatrefers to "X + preposition + Y" rather than just Y, it has ALWAYSbeen the case that X was singular and Y was plural (or X was plural and Y wassingular), and the verb had a form that matched X and didn't match Y.
这里letters才可以用were,而D这个人只是单数,所以这里应该是修饰的letters ,语法上是对的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 08:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部