【Native Speaker每日综合训练—39系列】【39-09】文史哲 Privacy

yuanhaowen

今天的越障有点偏文艺和矫情啊，不过还是写的蛮好的。

czgygz

Speaker:
the man invited the woman to go for a drive, but it turned out to be driving in an off-road vehicle which doesn't interest the woman at all.
Speed2 03:06
A European court ruled that google should hold resonsiblr for personal data found throught their searches.Google response includes three parts:
1.remove the search result exactly for the individual's name
2.remove only happen when a European version google is used & remove with an alert
3.notification will be sent to the publisher of the aricle whhich is blocked as a result of the request and this has triggered the most drastic results.

Speed3 03:02
Google may be deliberately undermining the ruling. All three parts of their responses contribute to this view which was put by Peston the jornalist for the

BBC.

Speed4 04:14
Google's response is in line with the law -- but it looks far worse than it is.
This whole affair demonstrates the huge power that Google already wields. Because, ultimately, it is Google carrying out this "censorship," not the court.
A well-executed reform will benefit every one.

Speed5 03:24
Tthe police cannot read through the cellphone taken from someone they arrest without first obtaining a warrant

Speed6 02:45
Ppl have different views on how significant the privacy interest is.

Obstacle:
this is a rather long article about privacy--not on a political sence but about the inner privacy.the passage is riddled with stories excerpted from the “

Mrs. Dalloway,”.The author also added some own opinion in the end.

limin501

Time 2 3’29’’
A european court ruled that search engine operators such as google could be held responsible for personal data which appear on web pages published by third parties and found through their searches.
Time 3 3’34’’
Google insists it is simply complying with the relevant articles in the European court of justice’s ruling
Time 4 3’30’’
A well-executed reform, more limited and more appropriate version of the right to be forgotten could be the untimate solution here.
Time 5 3’45’’
Time 6 4’
前面的速度片读的好恍惚
Obstacle  6’00’’
Williams has captured the same idea that we find in woolf’s novels.

vsetteacher

最后一篇，我只想用经典网络用语“贱人就是矫情”以及“说人话”来回应。
1:45,2:00,1:58,2:12,1:49,7:28,3:28

Yvonne52585

啦啦啦啦啦~~

septfish

Speed:
1'42'' Some European people found that their personal information is available on internet because some third parties provided these information.So they ask the search engines to remove these information.However,these information has not been totally removed.

3'18'' The European Court of Justice's ruling brings some negative effect to users and journalists.The announcement of some web pages have been censored makes users and journalists felt censored.

3'30'' Google is trying to find the solution to implement the effect of the censorship.The blocked information is still available because only the key words are censored but not the material.

4'42'' Smart phone differs from the old pocket thus the police has not right to check one's smart phone without warrant.

6'24'' Smart phone can not be checked before first warrant.   

Obstacle:
14'37''
Main idea:The balance between being known by others and being alone depends on that individuals how to balance their risks and rewards.

文章越读越慢越不懂，好忧心

planetandlucas

Speaking: Claudia and Jae talked about the off-road vehicle journey.

Time 2:  The artice talks about one illegal issue that is people can search their names on Google. (2:53)

Time 3:  Paragraphes illustrates two example to support the standpoints of the artilce, and furthermore argues that Google could do so on purpose. (2:53)

Time 4:  The article discusses about the result of Google's censorship and Google' operation and power about this measure. (2:43)

Time 5: The artilce discusses about how Supreme Court is grappling with new technology and how significant the privacy interest is? As an illustration, the author uses pocket staff and cellphone
as an example.  (3:14)

Time 6:  The author claims that he or she is happy that a court can have a good understanding about importance of new technology. (2:54)

Obstacle: The article discusses about Virginia Woolf’s opinion about privacy. Primarly, the author intorduce an important understanding about privacy, and furthermore introduces some other viewpoints and the
development of the idea of privacy. Morever, the author uses the example of Clarissa to explain the concept of privacy,and the development of privacy with change of the time. (8;00)

sherry8730

昨天休息了，今天就得补两篇，先去做8了，等着我~~

leo688

Part I: Speaker
off road vehicle
any terrain: sand, gravel, and mud
spinning and skidding
more exciting
mudding
whoopee

[Time 2]
2'15
European court rules that Google should eliminate some required privacy
google receives huge amount of such requirement
google's response: 1- remove a particular way, instead of the whole information; 2- appears for private and not appears for public; 3- some journalists upset if heard the notice of unsearchable information

[Time 3]
2'43
two examples of google reflects its overreaction
1- more censorship
2- make people feel more censored
3- make important journalists together to attempt to undermine the rules

[Time 4]
2'37
google reacts in line with ruling, but far worse
more appropriate version is desired

[Time 5]
2'33
police can not access individual cellphone since too much personal information inside
described the privacy in personal cellphone

[Time 6]
2'07
how significant interests for personal privacy
the degree in which a police could access personal privacy, less than legitimate government interest
do not know how is the individual hurt by espousing the privacy to police

Part III: Obstacle / [rest]
12'20
an introspection of privacy
1- inner privacy
2- regard ourselves
hold privacy even with friends and family

hawk！！！

Time2 2'10"
Under the European law, Google is facing three problems. First, it can only remove the search results. Second,  privacy alert. Third, upset journalists.
Time3 2'20"
a pretty abstract article..
Google's behavior caused problems: 1 more censorship, 2 create a bad atmosphere, 3 make journalists feel censored.
Time4 2'20"
Google should engage positively and actively with the ongoing reform process of the Data Protection Regime.
Time5 2'45"
background information: how does court treat new technologies raised question. Historical events. How police officials items in the suspect pockets. Why smart phone is different from these items.
Time6 2'02"
People should take care and protect their personal information. The court should  do investigation to find out how important cell phone privacy is for people.
Obstacle 8'22"
The author used a story to state Virginal Woolf's understanding of privacy. What it is and what its benefits and costs.
THX LZ!