- UID
- 791268
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-8-7
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
6.25 错误修改好
Whether the subject of full-length portrait, owned by a member of Austen family is Jane Austen? The reading consists that Jane Austen must be the subject, while the listening refutes that it is not true.
First, the passage presents that the Austen family commits the girl in the portrait is Jane Austen. However, the speaker think this reason is not reasonable. He proposes that the (删) though the portrait recognized as Jane Austen by her family(though引导从句,你这里不是完整的句子,应改the portrait was recognized blabla), but the portrait came up after several years that the Jane Austen had died. So her family could not confirm that very well if that was Jane Austen.
Second, the author contends that the face in the portrait resembles the adult Jane Austen depicted on Cassandra's sketch, which presents that the subject is Jane Austen. Whereas, the professor doesn't agree. He states that Jane Austen has a big family so that many distant relatives may look like her. And for example, one of her distant relative, Marry looks like her very much. So it couldn't tell us much.
Finally, the text contends that the author of this portrait may be Ozias Humphrey, who was active during the time that Jane Austen was still a teenager. This view, is totally refured by the speaker. The speaker tatess(单词查不出来,是不是拼写有误?) that it is not enough for just confirming the creater of the portrait by the style. The stamp, clinged to the portrait, was not saled by the Williams until the Jane Austen was 27. So if this is true, at the time this portrait was created, Jane Austen had been (这句应该不需要用过去完成时吧)27 years old, which also proves that the girl on the portrait is not Jane Austen.
感觉听力内容略少了一点儿,但我跟你听的差不多,我也不知道应该加一些什么,真是摔。其实,总体来说,很好! |
|