ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 竹林中人
打印 上一主题 下一主题

陈虎平三空题180题

  [复制链接]
231#
发表于 2016-9-8 10:42:26 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
232#
发表于 2016-9-12 11:28:07 | 只看该作者
dddddddddddddddddd
233#
发表于 2016-9-14 22:53:04 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
234#
发表于 2016-9-15 22:20:16 | 只看该作者
谢谢分享!
235#
发表于 2016-9-17 20:24:44 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主分享资料
236#
发表于 2016-9-17 23:49:44 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
237#
发表于 2016-10-8 10:01:08 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
238#
发表于 2016-10-10 08:34:05 | 只看该作者
The possibility whether arts can flourish, something similar with Renaissence, is far more complicated and it cannot be simply determined just by one single factor. Government funding may be one of the crucial factors, nevertheless, whether or not the government invest a great amount of money and make it accesible to all people should be doubted and requires further analysis. But at least, the integrity of the arts, in my own opinion, will not be marred due to government funding. Complex interplay within financial operation of the government, though, may give rise to a couple of problems. By and large, government funding bear no relation with the integrity of the arts.

At the first glance, government funding seems could provide significant infusion of energy for the arts, whereas this is not a must. I believe whether the condition of the arts could be thrived and therefore flourish has nothing to do with government funding. There are something far more important than governement funding when it comes to the necessity of flourishing of the arts.
239#
发表于 2016-10-10 13:04:25 | 只看该作者
感谢
240#
发表于 2016-10-11 13:40:34 | 只看该作者
thx!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-27 23:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部