[注意]中欧的实际薪水约=FT排名薪水/4，因为考虑到购买力等因素。

花则不累

我在exchange的学校听见这边的分析了.50% 2001届的学生,25%2000,25% 99届毕业生的薪水涨幅.大家没有必要来计较这些事情,我不是很care的.但这是中欧10多年来踏踏实实抓质量而不是炒作的结果. 另外这个排名综合了很多因素,就算是排名一样,每个学生的背景和情况也不一样.我们要关心的是自身能给中欧带来什么,能从中欧获得什么.这也是中欧前辈们一贯的追求,才让我们这些后来的学生乘凉的.我相信,我们毕业三年之后,中欧会因为我们的performance跻身前十..

brace

以下是引用花则不累在2005-1-28 6:24:00的发言：
我在exchange的学校听见这边的分析了.50% 2001届的学生,25%2000,25% 99届毕业生的薪水涨幅.大家没有必要来计较这些事情,我不是很care的.但这是中欧10多年来踏踏实实抓质量而不是炒作的结果. 另外这个排名综合了很多因素,就算是排名一样,每个学生的背景和情况也不一样.我们要关心的是自身能给中欧带来什么,能从中欧获得什么.这也是中欧前辈们一贯的追求,才让我们这些后来的学生乘凉的.我相信,我们毕业三年之后,中欧会因为我们的performance跻身前十..

这位兄弟说的好。佩服，真是大家风范。

fenix

the ranking link on FT is here:

http://rankings.ft.com/rankings/mba/rankings.html

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-30 0:12:09编辑过]

zdcgy

According to the rankings from Economist Intelligence Unit, ceibs is still ranked 95, and many FT's fast-progressing UK schools do not fare similarly well too.

While each ranking has its own bias, only when recognized by nearly every major ranking body can a school claim top**.  

xiaoxin

Tiger, someone praised you, xixi...

From my feeling in US, if you earn 1 yuan in China, that life quality is equal to 1 dollar in US for those daily things (lunch, dinner, parking, transportation...) except car and clothes : P

CEIBS_MBA2005

以下是引用zdcgy在2005-1-30 3:51:00的发言：

According to the rankings from Economist Intelligence Unit, ceibs is still ranked 95, and many FT's fast-progressing UK schools do not fare similarly well too.

While each ranking has its own bias, only when recognized by nearly every major ranking body can a school claim top**.  

yes, good point. so for CEIBS, the most urgent thing is to win accrediation by such institutes as AACB,

山峰

CEIBS_MBA2005 bro,

Thanks for your inputs here!