ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4854|回复: 12

[SC悬赏令] og中关于svo+comma+ving,ving的修饰问题

[复制链接]
发表于 2014-4-17 19:33:44 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
og13 sc
29. Emily Dickinson's letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.(e)
(A)    Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumbering
(B)    Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ended shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber
(C)    Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and that ends shortly before Emily's death in 1886 and outnumbering
(D)    Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother, ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, and outnumbering
(E)     Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan's marriage to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber


48.It is called a sea, but the landlocked Caspian is actually the largest lake on Earth, which covers more than four times the surface area of its closest rival in size, North America's Lake Superior.

(c)

(A)It is called a sea, but the landlocked Caspian is actually the largest lake on Earth, which covers

(B)Although it is called a sea, actually the landlocked Caspian is the largest lake on Earth, which covers

(C)Though called a sea, the landlocked Caspian is actually the largest lake on Earth, covering

(D)Though called a sea but it actually is the largest lake on Earth, the landlocked Caspian covers

(E)Despite being called a sea, the largest lake on Earth is actually the landlocked Caspian, covering

29题A选项的outnumbering不是修饰letters的么?为什么og说是无指代。。。而48题的C选项covering是修饰caspian的,og说没问题。。。求解答。
发表于 2014-4-17 19:55:24 | 显示全部楼层
对于楼主这个问题我原来也不止一次疑问过
其实是这样的,对于这类comma+ving的修饰语,不光要求逻辑主语为修饰的clause的主语,而且要求和修饰的clause在逻辑上有紧密联系,如第48题,covering...修饰xxx is the largest lake on Earth,主句说xxx是地球上最大的湖,那具体有多大呢,主句没说,于是后面的covering....来补充这个信息,注意是补充主句的信息!而第29题,主句说xxx给xx的信从xxxx年写到了xxxx年,而outnumbering补充的信息却是xxx给xx的信是最多的,补充的信息和主句没有的逻辑关系(至少是没有直接的),如果outnumbering...换成maintaining a intimate relationship between them就比较说得通了,因为maintaining....说明了为什么他们之间通信了这么长时间。
发表于 2014-4-17 19:56:58 | 显示全部楼层
如果outnumbering是修饰letters的,那么去除中间的乱七八糟,前后 Emily Dickinson's letters,outnumbering her letters to anyone else.且先不管逻辑关系,作者强调的是什么,outnumber的主语应该是人吧,难道是letters outnumber her letters?
发表于 2014-4-17 19:59:13 | 显示全部楼层
ing这种我也很纠结啊!!!!呜呜呜求大牛指导
 楼主| 发表于 2014-4-17 20:00:44 | 显示全部楼层
a31314431 发表于 2014-4-17 19:55
对于楼主这个问题我原来也不止一次疑问过
其实是这样的,对于这类comma+ving的修饰语,不光要求逻 ...

队友好,恍然大悟啊,十分感谢!
 楼主| 发表于 2014-4-17 20:03:18 | 显示全部楼层
yaomincui 发表于 2014-4-17 19:56
如果outnumbering是修饰letters的,那么去除中间的乱七八糟,前后 Emily Dickinson's letters,outnumberin ...

我觉得letters超过letters没有问题
 楼主| 发表于 2014-4-17 20:55:17 | 显示全部楼层
yaomincui 发表于 2014-4-17 19:59
ing这种我也很纠结啊!!!!呜呜呜求大牛指导

刚发现一个神贴,专门讲ving形式的,你可以去参考一下,个人觉得那个贴里边隐藏的内容更值得看。
http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... amp;highlight=doing
发表于 2014-4-17 21:35:06 | 显示全部楼层
不装逼会死星人 发表于 2014-4-17 20:55
刚发现一个神贴,专门讲ving形式的,你可以去参考一下,个人觉得那个贴里边隐藏的内容更值得看。
http:// ...

*comma+participle分词 的用法
this sort of modifier should actually satisfy TWO requirements:

1) it should apply most nearly to the subject of the preceding clause (as you've said); and, even more importantly,

2) it should have one of the following RELATIONSHIPS to that clause:分句

* immediate consequence
* simultaneous, but lower-priority, action

here, this modifier doesn't have either of these 2 relationships to the main clause, so it's used inappropriately.
逗号+分词,的用法,同时满足下面两项:
1.修饰离他最近的主语
2.此结构与 所修饰主语的分句的关系:直接的原因(因果关系),或者是同时低优先度(时间上同时发生)




我觉得有点奇怪。。。 comma v ing也算 comma+priciple吧??修饰离他最近的主语?
发表于 2014-4-17 21:39:05 | 显示全部楼层
不装逼会死星人 发表于 2014-4-17 20:03
我觉得letters超过letters没有问题

我好像有点明白了。。。。 两种情况,一种是修饰主语的,另外一种是表示结果,一般用bringing to...
leading...什么的,,是这样吗!
 楼主| 发表于 2014-4-17 22:39:28 | 显示全部楼层
yaomincui 发表于 2014-4-17 21:39
我好像有点明白了。。。。 两种情况,一种是修饰主语的,另外一种是表示结果,一般用bringing to...
lead ...

是的,一种修饰前面的主语。另一种就是修饰整个句子,也就是表结果。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-19 08:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部