关于game中的“an accurate and complete list ”

andrewhalleluja

小弟刚开始准备，一个考过lsat的学长告诉我game的部分没有什么必要啃bible,就是小学奥数题，小弟信以为真，刚开始上手还行，但是没有看过Game的bible,导致我被game中很多细小的tricky问题所困扰，本来很简单一个问题就错了！

在CD的Lsat版上潜水了两个星期，各位前辈的帖子让小弟很受启发，所以开一个处女贴，讲一个小问题，供后面新来的考友参考，不要犯一样的错误，也祝CDlsat版越来越好，也希望能在版上认识些朋友，准备的路上一个人战斗实在太寂寞啊。。。

言归正传，具体如下：
game中有一类问题，题干中会有“an accurate and complete list of...."，我一度以为这些题的用意都是一样的，就把他们归为了一类，后来发现其实在“an accurate and complete list of...."引出的问题有两类，我在做PT42Q19的时候有了深刻的认识,因为我用以前的经验错了!这两类的问题区别是这样的，我们先看两个例子：
1. “Which of the following is a complete and accurate list of all of the cars, any one of which could be parked in the third garage?”

2. “Which of the following could be a complete and accurate list of the cars parked in the third garage?”

乍看上去，Q1 and Q2 are same,但其实问题是不一样的！！

Answer:

Question 1 above asks for a global accounting of all of the cars that could ever park in the third garage.

Question 2 asks you for a single possible scenario - of all the possible combinations of cars, Question 2 just wants one such possibility.

You can quickly and accurately assess the different demands posed by these two questions by tracking the position of the word “could” within the sentence:

If the word “could” is near the end of the sentence (as in Question 1), then you’re looking for an answer giving a complete list of all possible entities.

If the word “could” is near the front of the sentence (as in Question 2), then you want a snapshot - an answer choice that gives you one possible permutation of elements to spaces.

To recap:

If could is near the end, then you want a global account.

If could is near the beginning, then you want a single permutation

以上 请各位大牛指正。