ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1536|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请问comma+v-ing 是否能承前修饰N的的问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-2-18 22:58:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
og13 111题A mutual fund having billions of dollars in assets will typically invest that money in hundreds of companies, rarely holding more than one percent of the shares of any particular corporation.



A正确
companies, rarely holding more than one percent


Bcompanies, and it is rare to hold at least one percent or more

Ccompanies and rarely do they hold more than one percent

Dcompanies, so that they rarely hold more than one percent

Ecompanies; rarely do they hold one percent or more  


og104Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.

(A)Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,

(B)In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter

(C)In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter正确

(D)Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations

(E)Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
第一道a选项的holding是结果状语。逻辑主语是前面整句话然后这个holding的动作apply to the subject of the previous clause"the mutual fund"
第二道题a选项错误在于 现在分词没能清晰的修饰,有人说是因为coordinating 可能修饰illustration引起歧义,如果是这样的话 holding不是也能修饰companies了么

如果他说的不对,第二题a选项不考虑主谓间隔过大这个问题,还有什么错误呢?

求大神解答。。。谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2014-2-19 20:03:47 | 只看该作者
求NN来解答一下。。。。万分感谢!!!!
板凳
发表于 2014-2-20 09:01:50 | 只看该作者
对于第二题,一些人的解释有误,A选项不是因为coordinating 可能修饰illustration而产生歧义,而是因为coordinating them with her narratives无法正确而又清晰的表达illustration 而产生了错误。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2014-2-20 11:27:18 | 只看该作者
kiwifoodtown 发表于 2014-2-20 09:01
对于第二题,一些人的解释有误,A选项不是因为coordinating 可能修饰illustration而产生歧义,而是因为coor ...

可不可以这样理解,ving 为壮语向后修饰谓语,但是them逻辑上又应该向前修饰illustration,所以不清晰?
5#
发表于 2014-2-20 13:12:53 | 只看该作者
mogu724 发表于 2014-2-20 11:27
可不可以这样理解,ving 为壮语向后修饰谓语,但是them逻辑上又应该向前修饰illustration,所以不清晰? ...

我不这么认为,coordinating在这里的确可以看成状语,但和修饰谓语无关,而illustration却的确需要一个明确的定语加以修饰,否则句子很难表达完整,coordinating显然没有起到这个定语的作用,所以说它修饰不清晰。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-2-20 16:34:04 | 只看该作者
kiwifoodtown 发表于 2014-2-20 13:12
我不这么认为,coordinating在这里的确可以看成状语,但和修饰谓语无关,而illustration却的确需要一个明 ...

喔喔谢谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-2 06:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部