og13 SC-105

mengzj

wlc思语 发表于 2014-7-5 18:31
弱弱的问一句，这里which不可以跳跃修饰tool么？把for private conversation看作介词修饰语，然后tool和r ...

manhattan里面说 which要遵循touch原则的，就是which一定是指代它前面那个词的~就我做题来看也是一直遵循这个原则的。
所以这里不可以跳跃到tool

个人想法，还请指正

zincgirl

谢谢谢谢

笑小笑小蚂蚁

wsywsywsy 发表于 2013-10-7 11:22
翻译：
M设想无线电会是一种私人交流工具，这个可以替代电话，然而，无线电会恰恰相反，它变成一种大众交流 ...

为什么C选项中that 可以跳跃指代the radio，，which就不能跳跃指代了呢

emmapotter

笑小笑小蚂蚁 发表于 2014-9-26 19:56
为什么C选项中that 可以跳跃指代the radio，，which就不能跳跃指代了呢

又看了 Manhattan 才明确，Manhattan中很确定的说 which 必须要就近指代，而it，that并没有说要完全符合就近指代，所以看来应该是 it，that 最好能就近指代，但是若在违背语义的情况下，可以考虑 不就近指代。

笑小笑小蚂蚁

emmapotter 发表于 2014-9-29 16:50
又看了 Manhattan 才明确，Manhattan中很确定的说 which 必须要就近指代，而it，that并没有说要完全符合 ...

2、 跳跃修饰在前有“核心词+介词、分词等修饰结构”或者插入语的情况下，which跳跃修饰前面的核心词，不能修饰紧邻的名词。

看下面例子
1.OG12-26
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


A,Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumberin


B,Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


C,Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering


D,Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering


E,Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
答案是E,这句话的which不能修饰其紧邻的名词Susan Huntington Dickinson，必须跳过介词结构to…，修饰核心词letter。

emmapotter

笑小笑小蚂蚁 发表于 2014-9-29 21:46
2、 跳跃修饰在前有“核心词+介词、分词等修饰结构”或者插入语的情况下，which跳跃修饰前面的核心词，不 ...

which 除了考虑 要就近指代，还要记得 which不能修饰人，而且可以根据 which were 判断出which指代的必须是复数，所以可知which指代的是 letters，看来总是离不开（ rules + meaning）的方法呀

不过，我突然想到一个问题：E简化后 就是：outnumber 的主语是 letters，但是前面并没有出现 letters，而简化后的主语是Dickinson，那letters 这个要根据 meaning来判断吗？

笑小笑小蚂蚁

emmapotter 发表于 2014-9-30 11:56
which 除了考虑 要就近指代，还要记得 which不能修饰人，而且可以根据 which were 判断出which指代的必须 ...

亲，不是喔。你看正确的句子是
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.
which不能指代人，所以肯定是指代前面的letters. 这个定语从句可以看出成是一个插入语，去掉which从句，剩下的就是 Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson outnumber her letters to anyone else.这个句子的主语就是letters哦。后面的 to Susan Huntington Dickinson是定语

emmapotter

笑小笑小蚂蚁 发表于 2014-9-30 16:17
亲，不是喔。你看正确的句子是
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson, which were  ...

哦对对对，我傻了，我把划线句子当成整个句子了，谢啦