- UID
- 855628
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-2-6
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
38. In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women
别的其实都清楚了就是想知道这里我选E之后的平行按理来说就是for equal...和for changes的平行。可是会不会与歧义觉得是for changes和for women平行呢??我原来做到这里的时候就不小心觉得会歧义因为有两个for把E排除了。
后来我想会不会是另外一种平行直接带入就变成了 for equal political and legal rights for changes完全不符合逻辑所以不算有歧义呢?是不是之前我对歧义的理解有问题呢。。。 |
|