ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz' that discuss one of Newton's books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton's calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz' own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz' notes are limited to early sections of Newton's book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton's calculus concepts and techniques are presented.

In the historian's reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2164|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

帮忙解决两个prep语法

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-18 19:42:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
198. Between 1990 and 2000 the global economy grew more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.A. Between 1990 and 2000 the global economy grew more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agricultureB. Between 1990 and 2000 the growth of the global economy was more than that during 10,000 years, from when agriculture beganC. The growth of the global economy between 1990 and 2000 exceeds that which had been for 10,000 years from the beginning of agricultureD. The growth of the global economy between 1990 and 2000 exceeds what it has been for 10,000 years, from when agriculture began         (A)E. The growth of the global economy between 1990 and 2000 exceeded what it did for the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture我对A选项的it代替economy存在疑问,因为这是比较级,都用that比较同一属性的事物。而且我认为1990-2000年的经济和10,000年以前-1950年的经济是不同的两个事物,不能用it指代。it指代前面出现的,而前面出现的是1990-2000的经济,与10000年的经济是不一样的,怎么能这样用?

191. For the last five years the Dutch economy has grown faster than the economies of Britain, France, and Germany, and the unemployment rate has remained well below that of the other three countries.  
这个是正确的改错答案,我想问的是后面为什么用that指代三个国家的unemployment rate而不是用those,那就会让人错误的联想到前面三个国家的economy也可以用单数代替。



收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-9-18 20:21:48 | 只看该作者
1 是同一事物就好比说 一个小孩子8-10岁长得超过前面8年
2 三国可以算出一个rate但是不能share economy
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-18 21:06:44 | 只看该作者
wandering_wind 发表于 2013-9-18 20:21
1 是同一事物就好比说 一个小孩子8-10岁长得超过前面8年
2 三国可以算出一个rate但是不能share economy ...

第二个我不太认同你的观点,首先前面是Dutch economy和后面三个国家的economies做比较,后面紧接着一个and结构,and要形式和逻辑都要并列。前面是dutch和三个比较,后面的失业率就不会和三个的综合rate比较。这样觉得逻辑不对呢,你觉得呢
地板
发表于 2013-9-18 21:52:03 | 只看该作者
remain是linking verb 前后要单复数一致的
5#
发表于 2013-9-18 21:53:41 | 只看该作者
另外 and前后并列没有到宾语单复数也需要一致的地步吧
6#
发表于 2013-9-22 11:28:18 | 只看该作者
liwen0625 发表于 2013-9-18 21:06
第二个我不太认同你的观点,首先前面是Dutch economy和后面三个国家的economies做比较,后面紧接着一个an ...

亲,复习的咋样了啊?
7#
发表于 2013-9-22 11:31:41 | 只看该作者
我解释一下为什么不能用those吧。这是一个基本的规则,如果比较的对象前面是economy,那么后面比较的是复数的economy必须补出原型economies而不是those;但如果前面的Dutch economy用的是Dutch economies,后面就可以用those了。
这样是为什么,后面的要用that而不用those的原因,如果是用复数的话,必须改成the unemployment rates,因为前面是单数的unemployment rate。
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-22 13:15:41 | 只看该作者
vertex顶点 发表于 2013-9-22 11:28
亲,复习的咋样了啊?

现在重新看GWD的24套题目,还没复习写作,做不想复习的就是写作。没个范文可以参考,也不知道自己写的作文分数在哪一档。
我有个boldface题要问你,出自GWD CR大全:
GWD6-Q16:
Historian:  Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus.  Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques.  It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent.  Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics.  Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false.  A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented.
In the historian’s reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
C. The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.
答案选D,我做这个题就是在C和D中纠结,不知道怎么排除C。
9#
发表于 2013-9-22 14:05:09 | 只看该作者
这个果断是选D啊,首先,前面的Background information都不理睬,从Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques这一句话开始分析:后面黑体1是在and since,说明黑1是一个premise用来证明一个结论的,他们支持的结论是:it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false.  
但是后面紧接着就说:a more cautious conclusion than this one is called for,说明前面的这个conclusion并不cautious,然后黑体是however。。。。。,后面就是来说明为啥a more cautious conclusion is called for的原因。 说明作者,即historian支持的观点是和several scholars的观点相反的。
然后答案C,support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends肯定是错误的啊,historian和scholar的观点相反,怎么可能是用来支持historian defends的观点呢?
于是接下来就不用看了,选D
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-22 14:45:47 | 只看该作者
vertex顶点 发表于 2013-9-22 14:05
这个果断是选D啊,首先,前面的Background information都不理睬,从Several scholars have argued that sin ...

哦,恍然大悟,谢谢啦
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 07:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部