ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 彼岸鸢尾yy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

不定式用法求大神指教啊OG13 Q128&Q133~~~~~~~~~

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2017-9-29 22:59:47 | 只看该作者
bonbonjon 发表于 2016-10-12 18:40
我觉得是独立主格,但是主格词和分词并不是逻辑上的动宾关系,所以分词不能用ed形式,我觉得可能是错在这 ...

如果是独立主格应该用逗号隔开吧?
12#
发表于 2017-10-9 16:24:38 | 只看该作者
我想请问一下为什么这里的A选项错误了?不能the elephant is the descended from an aquatic animal     和its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel平行?就是suggest that (the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal)and suggest that (its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel)
而一定要是that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal和 that its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel平行?
13#
发表于 2017-10-27 14:09:52 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!               
14#
发表于 2017-10-28 19:17:22 | 只看该作者
bonbonjon 发表于 2016-10-12 18:40
我觉得是独立主格,但是主格词和分词并不是逻辑上的动宾关系,所以分词不能用ed形式,我觉得可能是错在这 ...

同意!with结构错在这个独立主格暗示evolve是被动的,是was evolved,并且with表伴随要和主句时态一致,其实应该是had been evolved,错上加错
15#
发表于 2017-11-15 09:23:08 | 只看该作者
GMAT要上700 发表于 2017-10-9 16:24
我想请问一下为什么这里的A选项错误了?不能the elephant is the descended from an aquatic animal     和 ...

如果省略that 就无法判断后面是与“the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal”平行,还是与“Australian embryologists have found evidence that……”平行了
16#
发表于 2018-5-27 17:17:49 | 只看该作者
彼岸鸢尾yy 发表于 2013-10-6 19:59
这是一个外国instructor的解释,参考一下吧"evidence to suggest" and "evidence that suggests" are bot ...

“not because it's wrong -- just because it's ugly.”哈哈哈哈笑死
17#
发表于 2018-8-2 15:35:09 | 只看该作者
a
18#
发表于 2018-8-9 15:48:12 | 只看该作者
求问B选项中,除了descend没有用被动,还有哪里错了呢?
(B) Australian embryologists have found evidence that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel.
19#
发表于 2018-8-9 16:02:40 | 只看该作者
哈哈哈刚刚看到了Ron大神的解答.. 分享一下~
B选项中,-ING修饰语发生时间应该为过去时,和前句中现在时矛盾:
 -ING modifiers SHOULD adopt the timeframe of the clause to which they are attached. The problem here is that we need to change the timeframe: "the elephant is descended..." is stated in the present, because it's a timeless fact about evolution, but "its trunk originally evolved..." needs to be in the past because it's an isolated historical event. the -ING modifier mistakenly suggests that both of these belong to the same timeframe.
20#
发表于 2019-5-30 20:05:25 | 只看该作者
bonbonjon 发表于 2016-10-12 18:40
我觉得是独立主格,但是主格词和分词并不是逻辑上的动宾关系,所以分词不能用ed形式,我觉得可能是错在这 ...

独立主格需要有逗号隔开,独立主格是不影响主句的语法结构的,只不过在意思上和主句有联系,虽然里楼主发帖都过去这么久了。。。但是希望以后有同样问题的人可以看到~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-9 08:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部