Francis菜鸟作文贴 恳请狠批

FrancisEvens

Aug 21   综合
TPO15
改后


The lecture apparently disputes the points illustrated in the reading material. According to the passage, the rapid multiplying of cane toad can be stoped by national fence, trapping and virus attacktion. However, none of them regard in the eye of the lecture, because those methods mention would either be ineffective or cause an uncontrollable damage.

First of all, the professor claims that many national fences would be built in areas rich of rivers. And the water would carries young cane toad as well as eggs to the other side of the fence, causing the formation of a large enough population for their reproduce. In contrast, the reading passage points out that the fence would work out as it did to reabbits, which cannot live in water. So the lecture totally disagrees with the view made in the passage.

Second, the passage demonstrateds that volunteers may be gathered to capture and destroy toads. In the lecture, the professor admits the catching possibility, but she pointed out that most volunteers are untrained and thus are not able to distinguish native frog species that are likely in danger. Thus, it may lead to a problem to the environment.

Finally, the passage raises the issue that adopting virus is also an option. The professor opposes to the writer's expecttion. He asserts that using virus would definetly lead to sever consiquences to American native creatures, because toads and other animals which carry the virus can be transported to other continents by researchers. And if the virus were transported to America, lots of native animals there are going to be devastated. This is an ecological disaster and may harm the ecosystem as every species is part of the system.

In conclusion, the point made in the lecture contracts with what is presented in the reading material.


会尽量减少些字数的   这次虽然是30min打出来，但是时间赶到不行