GWD-6-Q31

peby1223

The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably on a spectrum of genetic relatedness.

A.     The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably

B.     That some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly while others look quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely that they vary considerably

C.     With some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar, it highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely considerable variation

D.     With some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar, it is a fact that highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely a considerable variation        (B)

E.     Because some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar, this fact highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably

PREP笔记上说，C和D中with独立主格的逻辑主语错误，这是什么意思？没明白。

jay871750293

hi，peby~
关于with引导独立主格的用法，我之前看其他帖子里讨论说好像是不需要逻辑主语的，manhattan上也没查到...

帮顶吧~

BTW,还想问一下PREP上说D选项中a fact没指代该怎么理解啊？
谢谢咯~

kimfeng

我觉得这题里的with 逻辑主语有问题就是with 一般表伴随是伴随主句的主语和谓语动词发生的。C，D中with 都伴随主句的it 这个动作发生。it指什么都不清楚自然逻辑主语有问题。楼下说fact没指代。一般出现fact这个抽象名词前面会有一个事实让fact指代，可是前面是个伴随状语啊。