ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 12188|回复: 32
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]质疑天山7-14的答案

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-24 21:38:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]质疑天山7-14的答案

天山7-14
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not be concluded.

A.   is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
B.   is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
C.   is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
D.   are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
E.   are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were
我觉得deal是可数名词啊,所以优先把用were排除了选B。而且A连签约双方都不清楚。NN们讨论下正确答案是什么?


沙发
发表于 2004-12-26 11:23:00 | 只看该作者

Ding!!


Can't find other discuss for 天山7-14.  Can NN give an answer?  


Thx

板凳
发表于 2004-12-26 11:45:00 | 只看该作者

个人拙见,选C

地板
发表于 2004-12-27 22:37:00 | 只看该作者
我也选B,为什么楼上的选C啊??能解释一下吗?谢谢
5#
发表于 2004-12-28 00:41:00 | 只看该作者

I would choose A.

here "were" is used instead of "was" is 虚拟语气.

In C. We don't know what "them" refers to.

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-12-29 02:16:00 | 只看该作者

我第2次做时又选对了。谢谢楼上的指点,现在连WERE也理解了。另外B还有个问题是SIGN没有用过去试。

7#
发表于 2004-12-29 15:13:00 | 只看该作者

选了C

觉得的 A: “。。。。 that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were。。。”

修饰 a merger agreement 有一点fragment

8#
发表于 2004-12-29 22:43:00 | 只看该作者

I prefer A.

"that includes a provision ... " modifies "agreement".

In choice B and C, if "they" and "them" refer to "investors", there is a logic error. The agreement should not be signed by Investors. It should be signed between the Investors party and the Bank.

9#
发表于 2004-12-30 00:01:00 | 只看该作者

我也选A

我覺得C的them的指代有問題

而這邊我覺的用to比用for來的好,,,

to 表目地 for 表原因,,

可是我同樣對deal were有疑問,,,覺得要用was

請NN們賜教

10#
发表于 2004-12-30 23:44:00 | 只看该作者

不论单复数,用were表示对现在或将来的虚拟。


楼主题目有误,末尾应为:not to be concluded.


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-30 23:51:10编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 22:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部