【每日阅读训练第四期——速度越障19系列】【19-05】文史哲

ywxkdxh

楼主辛苦了~
02‘07
01'53
02'39
02'00
03'09
06'37
阅读要坚持~

kudoucliff

（1）1:35
（2）1:50
（3）2:12
The primary purpose of the passage is to solidify the claim that Internet is equal to everyone, without regards for physical boundaries or social strata. The author cites several examples: the first one is Zhu Ling's case in which Zhu suffered from mysterious disease and was gravely damaged. One of her friends used the nascent avenue of Internet to ask for the reason and finally got the answer. Recently, Internet sleuths warm the topic with search tools to find Zhu's roommate, who was suspicious for the poisoning but got off unpunished because of her well-connected family; the second one is about a detective using falsified evidence and bad witness through his career; the third one is about an embarrassment, during which Browne told a kidnapped boy's family that the boy had been dead; the third one is a non-crime one that a professor used his method to prove ABC conjecture, putting his article on the Internet, but nobody could understand him.
（4）1:24，The primary purpose of the passage is to illustrate the author's point that men who alienate himself to be slave for others cannot be said to own rights; actually people living under the sovereign of a king get nothing.
（5）2:10，The primary purpose of the passage is to substantiate that a person has no rights after being sold; thus treating the person as a people and the person bought the people as the government, we know that we cannot tolerate an arbitrary government and that people should have position to accept or reject the government.
（6）5:45，The primary purpose of the passage is to discuss the wine culture which the author once thought barbaric and then explored why it was tolerated. The author used metaphors to illustrate how rude the behavior of the waiter was. Also, he analyzed how the customers and hosts would feel being treated by so. Moreover, he listed several reasons led to such problems, including the price of wine. Finally, he believed the behavior could be stopped, citing an example of a lady refusing to attend an invitation.

gyb192483

TIME1：01'31''
TIME2：01'29''
TIME3: 01'50''
TIME4: 01'53''
TIME5: 02'20''

Obstacle: 06'17''
Main idea: the manner of waiter to handle something
Attitude: negtive
Structure:
==> Point out the topic
==> recall the experience
==> descripe the situation
==> analysis of this behavor and two reasons are provided
==> why the narrator did not critisize the waiter
==> conclusion is drawn. Next time to refuse the offer

kudoucliff

adamzjw 发表于 2013-5-20 19:40
1:58
2:14
2:50

Dear,

用中文讲解一下啊……time1、2、3综合起来讲的就是Internet是一个great leveler，就是对大家都很平等……然后引用了朱令案，说很久以前她的同学用Internet搞清楚了她的病情，很久以后（现在）网络侦探（sleuths）开始查她的室友……然后举了两个其它的例子，一个说有个侦探一生都在用伪证来工作，另一个说有一个人告诉那些孩子被强奸的家庭他们的孩子死掉了。这些事儿都被曝光了，成为丑闻……然后又说了一个非犯罪的，有个教授把自己对ABC conjecture的证明放在网上，大家都看不懂……每个点都在紧扣主旨——网络很平等，很open，大家都可以参与。

kudoucliff

abc791201064 发表于 2013-5-20 10:53
1.39 The ineternet now creats a place in which there is no stratefy and bound. As for the Zhuling Ca ...

Dear，

第四篇就是讲嘛：权利是生下来就有的，一个人把自己卖了（alienate）就没有权利啦，把一个人扩大到一群人，这一群人把自己卖给king，那么是不是也没有权利啦？但是有人说king给了他的臣民们很多东西啊，但是作者认为king是要靠着这些东西活才把他们给臣民们的……然后又讲暴君也给臣民tranquility啊，但是有tranquility就一定好吗？希腊人住在独眼巨人的洞里面也很tranquil啊，但是他们只是在tranquil中等着被吃掉而已……
第五篇就接着讲：一个人不可以卖掉自己，卖自己的契约是无效的而且荒唐的；如果一个人非要把自己卖了，那他不能卖他的孩子吧？因为这种权利属于他孩子自己……但是政府呢，不仅可以鱼肉臣民，还可以鱼肉以未来为代价满足现有的需求，这是不可以的，所以civilians一定要有一个position去接受或拒绝政府的行为……放弃自由就是放弃权利，这是跟人类的本性相违背的，放弃权利也就放弃了义务，一个没有义务的人也不对其行为负责……如果我的奴隶属于我，那他有什么权利是我不可以侵犯的呢？所以有的人探讨的奴隶的rights是不存在的……

DreamerTaki

1-30
Internet can connect two generation, Zhu's case in China is an example
1-22
the story of NYPD detective and of another loose-cannon crime solver Jon Ronson again prove that internent can connect two generation
1-40
1-40
conventions form the basis of all legitimate authority among men
2-29
how madness create no rights
6-00
it's rude of waitress to fill your wine bottle when you are having meal

okplokpl0714

TIME1--00:02:51
TIME2--00:02:27
TIME3--00:02:47
TIME4--00:02:14
TIME5--00:02:45

越障--00:08:54

adamzjw

kudoucliff 发表于 2013-5-21 00:43
Dear,

用中文讲解一下啊……time1、2、3综合起来讲的就是Internet是一个great leveler，就是对大家都很 ...

每个故事我都懂，但我还是不能接受怎么合在一起就证明是leveler了。
更何况第二个例子不是媒体（The New York Times和Guardian）的报道么？和Internet的关系在哪？
感觉给的例子都超级跳跃。

abc791201064

kudoucliff 发表于 2013-5-21 00:54
Dear，

第四篇就是讲嘛：权利是生下来就有的，一个人把自己卖了（alienate）就没有权利啦，把一个人扩大 ...

谢谢您 我再把文章根据您的翻译阅读一遍  3Q

abc791201064

Do subjects then give their persons on condition that the king takes their goods also? I fail to see what they have left to preserve.


这个subject 怎么理解  呢请问

subject  [sub·ject || 'sʌbʒɪkt]
n.  题目, 科目, 主题
v.  使隶属, 使受到
adj.  受他国统治的, 受制于...的, 未独立的