5.19 独立

qianjun06

TOP 7

The writer makes a point that American companies will not receive the ecocertification for several reasons. On the contrary, the lecturer demonstrates a contradictory idea that American companies will seek the ecocertification for their wood productions.  

To start with, contrary to the believe in the reading that American consumers will not pay attention to the ecocertification label, the professor says that consumers will be more confident to find such label products identified by a certain department. These labels will claim that the products will have better reputation and customers will trust them. Therefore, the first reason presented in the reading context is refuted.  

In addition, the author holds the view that the wood maybe too expensive to be purchased. In contrast, the speaker challenges the idea by saying that consumers don't really care about the price, unless the price is much higher or lower that the other ones. Consumers will care about the value of preserving and protecting the environment. This directly casts doubt on its counterpart in the reading.  

Last but not least, the reading material deems that companies will not keep up with the developments in the rest of the world. On the other hand, the listening material presents a conflicting view that foreign companies will have competition with the national ones. If the national companies don't offer products with ecocertification labels, they will lost consumers, and if the domestic companies slowed to capture those customer, the foreign companies will  soon crowded into the market. Thus, the final reason for not attempting the strategy is unsound.

Gkibt

qianjun06 发表于 2013-5-29 20:57
5.29Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past young people are m ...

句型多变，有明确观点和例证，运用高级词汇。 我觉得第一段要是能直接提出factors会更好， 美国人更喜欢直接进入主题。

qianjun06

5.31  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules in societies today are too strict for young people

In recent years, there is a public controversy whether the rules in our society currently are too strict for young people. Those who criticize the statement argue that more chances and opportunities are provided for the young. However, some other people are in support of this notion. Contrary to the opinion of the former is my heartfelt believe that young people are facing with crucial challenges nowadays.  

To start with, in the contemporary society, a multitude of young people are increasing aware of the fundamentality of the education, so as to obtain a decent job and to enjoy a better lift quality. In order to master a diploma, not only need young people to acquire more knowledge from the universities after their hardy day work, it is inevitable for them to pass the certificated exams in order to master the skills, as theory and practice are intrinsically connected. Leisure time may be deprived and be filled with the lessons. Living under stress for a long time is harmful to their health, causing symptoms such as ulcer and high blood pressure. It provides an example of the mental health clinics. According to the world health organization, the number of the patients who suffer from some mental disease has increased from 100 million to 500 million in the world. Thus, on no account can we ignore the importance of the burdens laid on the young people from the strict rules.  

In addition, young people are more stressful in their daily life in these years. High price of food, economic recession, loans on property, as well as being anxious about losing jobs are all practical dilemmas that push the young persons to work hard and never refuse any requirement from their bosses. On the same time, our society requires them to fully be devoted to the establishment of our modern county, they have to work overtime and pay attention to their families as well. For example, my brother has to work 80 hours a week in order to accomplish the project in time as well as to be promoted by his leader. But in the family, he has to be a qualified husband. Each evening after daily work, he will cook for his family and check his child' assignment. Therefore, we cannot emphasis the stress from daily live that young people are facing too much.  

When it is obvious to consider that rules are strict to the youngs, isn't it necessary that it presents us some consideration to the positive points the strict rules cause? For one thing, we will be more mature through processes of stressful work and will be more capable to cope with some issues we cannot conquer before. For another, these strict rules may improved us to a higher lever, in which our financial crisis may disappear.  

Considerable though the advantages that strict rules may bring about are, they cannot compete with the challenges and stress that living under nightmare situation results in, when working in higher loads and living with a accelerating tempo are taken into consideration.

qianjun06

TPO 9

The writer makes a point that Fuel-cell engines have several advantages over internal-combustion engines. On the contrary, the lecturer demonstrates a contradictory idea that scientists may be too optimistic of this hydrogen machines.  

To begin with, contrary to the believe that  Fuel-cell engines rely on renewable resources, the professor says that the hydrogen is not easily available, for the reason that hydrogen can be only produced artificially, and it is difficult to produce and store the resources. Thus the first reason stated in the reading text is refuted.  

In addition, the author holds the view that hydrogen-bases fuel cells can solve the pollution problems. In contrast, the speaker challenges the viewpoint by stating that the pollution cannot be solved actually. Because the process of the producing such pure fuels needs a lot of energy, such as burning the coal and oil. This directly casts doubt on its counterpart in the reading.  

Last but not least, the reading material deems that fuel-cell engines will soon be economically competitive. On the other hand, the listening material presents a conflicting notion that this new engines are not saving. In order to produce this engines, a more expensive metal will be need and without such material, chemical reactions cannot be launched to produce the electricity to power the engines. So, the method to manufacture a more convenient and economical engine is so far unsuccessful.