OG13-22 请教平行中介词可以省略吗？

solde

22. Plantsare more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, andconverting it to energy-rich sugars.

(A) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon thanare fungi,

(B) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon thanfungi,

(C) Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiringcarbon,

(D) Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiringcarbon,

(E) Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi,

请问这道题中“converting it to energy-rich sugars”前面是省略了at吗？

板栗在奋斗

I do better than Tom in swimming and running.
Will that help you?
But actually i am not very sure. It can be better if someone will continue explaining.
Many thx.

solde

我今天又想了一下觉得应该是一般不能省at，但是这里省掉也没有歧义，所以是可以的。还是那句话，逻辑为王啊。

sandefia

问一下，为啥A答案错？OG里说in the form of carbon dioxide错误修饰了 fungi?这是为什么啊?难道不能跳过修饰carbon么？？？

solde

这个地方是就近修饰fungi，名词的修饰词必须就近修饰名词