关于“划线内容多，答案没有可比性”这种类型题的解题思路

down123

我觉得有一种类型的题特别耗时间，就是：”划线内容多，答案没有可比性”。；一般只能通读句子，然后一个个过。但由于划线内容多，读句子时间长；各个答案又差别很大，句式结构上没什么可比性。结果就是这类题错误率特别高，即使做对，耗费的时间也特别长。比如下面这题 （Prep 2008-158， OG-121)：

158. (OG12-121)
Sales of wines declined in the late 1980s, but they began to grow again after the 1991 report that linked
moderate consumption of alcohol, and particularly of red wine, with a reduced risk of heart disease
A.  they began to grow again after the 1991 report that linked moderate consumption of alcohol, and
particularly of red wine, with a reduced risk of heart disease
B.  after the 1991 report that linked a reduced risk of heart disease with a moderate alcohol consumption,
particularly red wine, they began growing again
C.  in a 1991 report, moderate alcohol consumption, and particularly of red wine, which was linked with a
reduced risk of heart disease, caused them to begin to grow again
D.  with a reduced risk of heart disease linked in a 1991 report with moderate alcohol consumption, in
particular red wine, they began growing again            
E.  a  reduced  risk of  heart disease  linked  to  moderate  alcohol  consumption  in  a  1991  report,  and  in
particular red wine, started them growing again

划线内容多，答案没有可比性。

各位针对这种题有什么好建议吗？

down123

有大侠能帮着看看吗？

down123

babybearmm 提到过类似题的解答思路 ；http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-739174-11-1.html
“宏观把握句意-找split-...”这样的problem-solving process恰恰也是解全划线题目的最有效的方法。

不过不是很直观，有大侠能针对上面的题目简答分析一下吗？