ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (OVPO)

00:00:00

Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the stars, and hydrogen bombs, merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear reactors.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4532|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全541的新问题,涉及众多-->pumpkin转移

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-14 21:43:00 | 只看该作者

大全541的新问题,涉及众多-->pumpkin转移

以下是引用robertchu在2004-6-13 3:37:00的发言:541   Nuclear fusion is the force that powers the Sun, the stars, and hydrogen bombs, merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear reactors.



(A) merging the nuclei of atoms and not splitting them apart, as in nuclear reactors


(B) merging the nuclei of atoms instead of splitting them apart, like nuclear reactors


(C) merging the nuclei of atoms rather than splitting them apart, as nuclear reactors do


(D) and merges the nuclei of atoms but does not split them apart, as is done in unclear reactorsE


(E) and merges the nuclei of atoms, unlike atomic reactors that split them apart


I don't think E is the best answer.  I feel C might be a better answer.  Discussions?
I remember seeing this question before, but could remember where. Kaplan?  Or Princeton?  Or OG?  Any pointers? Thanks!


这道题首先有个概念:neuclear fusion和neuclear reactor是两个完全相反的动作。那么C的错误就很明显了,C意味着两个动作相同,都是做A而不是做B。

前几天看到一个NN以此为例说明现在分词的用法,今天又看到其他帖子NN的讨论涉及此题,我产生了一些问题:


1,选E,因为不能表伴随动作。Nuclear fusion is the force that 表示一种事实, merge the nuclei of atoms 表示贯穿全程的动作, 怎么不能同时发生呢?


2,选项C表示nuclear reactors和主句主语执行相同动作。可是as,like放在后面应该是和邻近的部分进行比较吧,这在大全里有明显的例子:


Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.


(A) like adults


(B) unlike an adult


(C) as adults


(D) as adults do(D)


(E) as an adult


这里的as adults do明显是和organize而非do not organize进行比较


以上疑惑,望得到NN指点

沙发
发表于 2005-5-3 13:33:00 | 只看该作者
同问, 大家给点意见!
板凳
发表于 2005-5-3 19:08:00 | 只看该作者

我认为E还是正确地


在C中,分词是存在修饰不清的问题


但是我同意楼主说得,就是


as,like放在后面应该是和邻近的部分进行比较

同时他给出的例题也证明了这一点,也就是说C不存在as的错误


至于Avantasia的问题,我认为搂住给的例子,也可以用来说明,就是



Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.


(A) like adults


(B) unlike an adult


(C) as adults


(D) as adults do(D)


(E) as an adult


这里若是像你讲的unlike与最近的名词比较的话,那这个例子也不对,因为最近的名词是their attention or perceptions ,所以,我认为还是与主语相比,只是动词与最近的相比,这也属于你列举的大全中两个与主语相比的例子相同吧


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=108517&page=1


PS:我认为还是要关注一下逻辑意思,单考规则有时确实会陷入语言漩涡


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-3 19:58:48编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-5-3 20:15:00 | 只看该作者

?

Because young children do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, like adults, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.

(A) like adults

(B) unlike an adult

(C) as adults

(D) as adults do(D)

(E) as an adult

这题选D, 真好验证了由于修饰的歧义, 所以不能选A. 我觉得这个题目如果用like接的话, 比较ETS的方式是:

Because young children , like audlts, do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.

5#
发表于 2005-5-3 20:27:00 | 只看该作者

这题选D, 真好验证了由于修饰的歧义, 所以不能选A. 我觉得这个题目如果用like接的话, 比较ETS的方式是:


Because young children , like audlts, do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.


我怎么觉得这个有歧异呢

6#
发表于 2005-5-3 20:34:00 | 只看该作者

147. Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than an emotional bond based on romantic love.

(A)  Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than

(B)   As did other seventeenth-century colonists, Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a prop­erty arrangement rather than viewing it as

(C)  Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement, like other seventeenth-century colonists, rather than viewing it as

(D)  Marriage to Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, was viewed as a property arrangement rather than

(E)   Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, viewed marriage as a property arrangement rather than

In E, the best choice, a modifying phrase begun by like immediately follows the name it modifies, Samuel Sewall. E also uses the idiomatic construction viewed marriage as.... Choice A inserts an adverbial modifier, as other... colonists, without the necessary did. It also uses the unidiomatic construc­tion viewed marriage like .... Both B and C use the unidio­matic construction viewed marriage to be .... C incorrectly places the adjective phrase like other... colonists after the word arrangement, which it cannot logically modify. D offers a confusing and awkward passive construction marriage to. Samuel Sewall... was viewed

结构完全相同的句子, 怎么会有歧义?

7#
发表于 2005-5-3 21:06:00 | 只看该作者

斑竹举的例子很好,like+n的确是与最接近的名词性成分比较。

至于这道题我认为不选c的原因是主句及其限制性定于从句中均有谓语,那么后面的分词结构会出现修饰对象的模糊。我的结论是comma前的部分谓语不止一个,分词结构就不适合使用。这个观点,请指正。

8#
发表于 2005-5-3 23:16:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Avantasia在2005-5-3 20:34:00的发言:

147. Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than an emotional bond based on romantic love.


(A)  Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than



(B)   As did other seventeenth-century colonists, Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a prop­erty arrangement rather than viewing it as



(C)  Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement, like other seventeenth-century colonists, rather than viewing it as



(D)  Marriage to Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, was viewed as a property arrangement rather than



(E)   Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, viewed marriage as a property arrangement rather than



In E, the best choice, a modifying phrase begun by like immediately follows the name it modifies, Samuel Sewall. E also uses the idiomatic construction viewed marriage as.... Choice A inserts an adverbial modifier, as other... colonists, without the necessary did. It also uses the unidiomatic construc­tion viewed marriage like .... Both B and C use the unidio­matic construction viewed marriage to be .... C incorrectly places the adjective phrase like other... colonists after the word arrangement, which it cannot logically modify. D offers a confusing and awkward passive construction marriage to. Samuel Sewall... was viewed


结构完全相同的句子, 怎么会有歧义?


你这个例子确实具有代表性,但是我觉得你对那个句子的改法有问题



Because young children , like audlts, do not organize their attention or perceptions systematically, they may notice and remember details that their elders ignore.


前面是because从句,不完整,不能随便用逗号隔开,查了一下, 逗号没有这种用法。


PS:你在4楼想问的是什么问题?

9#
发表于 2005-5-3 23:16:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tonyadidas在2005-5-3 21:06:00的发言:

斑竹举的例子很好,like+n的确是与最接近的名词性成分比较。


至于这道题我认为不选c的原因是主句及其限制性定于从句中均有谓语,那么后面的分词结构会出现修饰对象的模糊。我的结论是comma前的部分谓语不止一个,分词结构就不适合使用。这个观点,请指正。



tony,举两个例子说说你的结论好不好
10#
发表于 2005-5-3 23:19:00 | 只看该作者
Avantasia还是在你的那个帖子里讨论吧,和紫草JJ一起讨论,把这个内容转到那个帖子里,方便大家以后看
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 00:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部