求教OG12-21Neuroscientists, having amassed~

jay871750293

nami123 发表于 2013-4-22 19:26
谢谢enkyklios！
把RON的解释share给你和大家：
the "comma + ing" modifier should only be used when:

同样疑惑时态问题....

但LZ解释说 drawing 与amass同时发生，对此我有些疑惑，按理说应该是先积累了知识，再得到结论的吧，不会说边积累辨得出结论吧...

望LZ解惑啊~~
非常感谢~~~

coconutmi

jay871750293 发表于 2013-4-25 15:56
同样疑惑时态问题....

但LZ解释说 drawing 与amass同时发生，对此我有些疑惑，按理说应该是先积累了知识 ...

这个不属于Ron 提到的immediate consequence

他的意思是：

that's not an "immediate consequence" -- when we say "immediate consequence, we mean a consequence that is proximate, immediate, and produced as an essentially unavoidable result of the main action.

for instance:

the bullet entered Smith's brain, killing him instantly --> this is an immediate and automatic consequence; if the bullet does this, then smith will be killed.

john scored 90 on the most recent test, raising his overall average by two points --> again, an immediate and automatic consequence; if john gets this score, there will automatically be the stated consequence for his average.

in the problem at hand, drawing new conclusions is not an automatic and essentially unavoidable consequence of amassing the knowledge in question; the researchers must actively go beyond just amassing the knowledge to draw those conclusions.

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/neuroscientists-having-amassed-a-wealth-of-knowledge-t11470.html

AUVVVVV

又做错了一遍这个题。。才觉得D这个选项考的好细啊。。

LUOWEI_

enkyklios 发表于 2013-4-22 17:55
对D有疑问还情有可原，E的话根本就算不上个句子。

D：  ，now drawing solid conclusions about how the h ...

求教E为什么不是个句子....主谓宾都是完整的。