ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3089|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

T-9-Q27. 大全987-606求教~!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-4-17 22:48:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
T-9-Q27. 大全987-606  A
Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.
Research  on the nature of language and the process that produce and make it understandable  (it 指代谁??)
A.    hat produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
B.    of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
C.    by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity   改变句子意思了。
D.    by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
E.     by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

A化简为:Research  on the nature of language and the process that produce and make it understandable  (it 指代谁??)是nature还是language 我觉得逻辑上应该是language但是语法上却应该是nature???   难道说我想错了?是想让语言的特性更加understandable???   求翻译。。。。









收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-4-18 18:36:42 | 只看该作者
It指代的肯定是language或者nature中的一个,而前者更加符合逻辑意思。我偏向于指代前者。因为语法也是为逻辑服务的。nature of language 相当于language's nature,manhattan sc 5th第72页提到所有格后面的代词一般不能指代像language所处位置的词,不过关于这点是有争议的。gmat并未否认不能指代,只不过gmat不会把这些点作为做题时候的split,说明并不影响做题。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-18 21:42:18 | 只看该作者
bejamin1111 发表于 2013-4-18 18:36
It指代的肯定是language或者nature中的一个,而前者更加符合逻辑意思。我偏向于指代前者。因为语法也是为逻 ...

谢~!!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
地板
发表于 2013-8-20 16:10:18 | 只看该作者
神啊救救我吧
5#
发表于 2014-2-28 11:16:51 | 只看该作者
难道 processes的逻辑可以自己produce,而不是by which produce?

C的句意更符合逻辑吧?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 13:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部