Argument 4 菜鸟第一篇 求猛拍

fightingdaping

Argument 4   第一次写共用了35分钟还不太会发帖子希望大家猛拍呀不胜感激

The proposal of the author in the argument that the consumer should choose Adams Reality as a reasonable choice of selling the house offer an interesting and seeming logical argument but to move forward to evaluate the validity of the argument need more information and thought. Though the correlation seems logical and probable, there may be hidden factors that prevent the Adams Reality from an ideal choice.

The author made the assumption that Adams Reality is superior to Fitch Reality due to the fact that 40 real estate agents in Adams Reality compared to 25 in Fitch. It is probable right that in some instance 40 real estate agencies may work more than only 25 agencies. But the author made a hasty conclusion only based on the sole evidence. It is likely that the working efficiency of Fitch doubles that of Adams Reality, so high working efficiency can make up the disadvantage of less agencies. In order to strengthen the conclusion the author need to survey the real work efficiency and production of each company, then make a cogent conclusion about the superiority of the two company.

In addition, the author concludes that the Adams Reality may offer a better price of the house resulting from the fact that the averaged $168,000 home sales in Adams is higher than $144,000 of Fitch. The author failed to take into account other factors which may also attribute to the higher sell price may undermine the assumptions. Perhaps the quality, the design, the square and the environment of the house sold by Adams company is better than the Fitch, or perhaps the average sell price of the past five years of Fitch exceeds that of Adams despite of the last year unsatisfactory behavior of Fitch. If either of the two scenarioes proved to be true, it would cast serious doubt on the soundness of the stated assumption.

Last but not least, it is not wise to assume the selling rate of Adams is faster than Fitch by comparing the selling rate of Adams ten years ago and that of Fitch last year. It is common sense that everything changes with the time passing. The house selling market and the need of house of consumer and the policy of the government all play an important role in determining the selling rate of the house. Consequently, without considering other explanations and the changes happened in the ten years, we can hardly conclude houses registered in the Adams can sell more quickly.

In sum, though Adams seems performs better than Fitch from the superficial evidence and assumption, the author need to evaluate the real production and working efficiency of the two company in order to strengthen his assumption. What's more, the house quality including the design, the square and the temporary average selling rate also need to better sound the argument.