ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1265|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助讨论]关于og13语法的一些问题 菜鸟求教4!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-2-2 22:38:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
65. Digging in sediments in northern China, evidence has been gathered by scientistssuggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had previously thought.


(A) evidence has been gathered by scientists suggestingthat complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had


(B) evidence gathered by scientists suggests a muchearlier emergence of complex life-forms than had been


(C) scientists have gathered evidence suggesting thatcomplex life-forms emerged much earlier than


(D) scientists have gathered evidence that suggests amuch earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that which was


(E) scientists have gathered evidence which suggests amuch earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that

evidence应该是一个抽象名词吧?

D为什么不对,一个抽象名词后面跟一个that的同位语从句

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-2-4 13:00:57 | 只看该作者
1,如果硬要理解d选项,第一个that 引导定语从句,第二个是which 引导的定语从句的先行词。。
2,suggest  a much earlier emergence 没有直接用动词简洁
3,that which was previously thought 这里的that应该是指emergence? 后面对它的修饰语没意义啊,感觉这里应该是(what was)previously thought
板凳
发表于 2013-2-5 10:35:27 | 只看该作者
D 选项的错误在于 that suggests amuch earlier emergence of complex life-forms 和 that which was previously thought. 形式上作了对比,意思为“。。。而非。。。”不合句意。
地板
发表于 2013-2-5 11:24:01 | 只看该作者
借用ron对此的总结:如果用that指代的时候,后面必须跟着一个modifier,而不是subject+verb的形式,例如:the population of argentina is more than that of urugay----correct
the total money i have is twice that you have----incorrect

D中其实也是一样的,that which was中which是subject,was是verb。所以这种用法本来在GMAT中就是不承认的,是错误的~
5#
发表于 2013-2-5 11:37:28 | 只看该作者
我的理解是把原句用了emergy,选项里就不能改变他的形式,改成emergence,因为改变词性会对原意有细微的改变。OG13 SC39 也是类似的题目。

我也是菜鸟,我的想法仅作参考吧。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 02:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部