- UID
- 752249
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-4-24
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
刚好有人问这题,贴在这了 国外instructor有两种解释Ron认为是作为non-comma ving的例外做adverbial的(我比较倾向这种理解) e-GMAT认为是who作为更加critical的modifier出现在navigators 和gathering 中间 http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/like-the-great-navigators-who-first-sailed-around-the-earth-t3618-15.html
RonPurewal | Post subject: Posted:Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:41 am
|
| | ManhattanGMAT Staff | |
Posts:7770 | H wrote: Hi, although my post was answered a month ago by a guest, I am still not convinced that "gathering..." can grammatically skip through the preceding noun.
if this is an authentic gmatprep problem (which it should be, given its having been posted in this folder), then the answer to this quandary is simple: it's the official answer, so, "gathering" CAN, as you put it, "skip through the preceding noun."or, more likely, it's used as anadverbialmodifier, modifying the preceding CLAUSE.
while you should of course be attuned to the vagaries of official gmat grammar, there's really no point in questioning practices that are deemed acceptable in official answers. if the gmat thinks that something is grammatically ok, then it's grammatically ok. it's their playground, they make the rules, and you're honestly wasting your study time by questioning those rules. (the gmat isn't a democracy.)
you can't write "the gmat that is as hard as...", because that implies that there are other gmat's thataren'tas hard as the lsat. analogy: my brother, who lives in long beach, likes sushi-->i only have one brother,so the modifier is disposable and can be bracketed with commas my brother who lives in long beach likes sushi-->i have more than one brother,so i have to single out the one who lives in The Beach notice that this distinction is more subtle with people, because both essential and nonessential modifiers begin with 'who'. it's easier with objects, because you start essential modifiers with 'that' and nonessential modifiers with 'which'.
|
|
RonPurewal | Post subject:Re: Like the great navigators who first sailed around the Earth, Posted:Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:55 am
|
| | ManhattanGMAT Staff | |
Posts:7770 | tankobe wrote: OK! the official answers are always right. Ron! but there is still a question worthy thinking : wether thisgatheringis used asadvto modifysailed around the Earthor asadjto modifynavigators?
according to the original sentence--to gather information about its size...,gatherseems like to function asadvto modifysailed around the Earth! ron or stracey, i really want to read your oppinion!!
i think it is adverbial, yes.
|
| http://gmatclub.com/forum/noun-modifiers-can-modify-slightly-far-away-noun-135868.html 3: Like thegreat navigatorswho first sailed around the Earthgatheringinformation about its size and the curvature of its surface, astronomers have made new observations that show with startling directness the large-scale geometry of the universe. (Choice D)
After reading this one, almost all of you will say that “gathering” is a verb-ing modifier that is placed after “Earth” and is not preceded by a comma. Hence, it must modify “Earth”. This modification makes no sense because Earth dis not gather information. The great navigators did. This sentence is incorrect. BUT IN REALITY, this sentence is absolutely correct. Here is why.
Structurally, “who first sailed around the Earth” is a clause. Here “who” stands for “the great navigators”. Now together “the great navigators who first sailed around the Earth” is a big noun phrase (refer to the mini article on noun phrases and Noun modifiers).
Many of you may argue that this entity contains a “who clause”. How can we classify as a noun phrase. We can classify this as a noun phrase since it has a noun at its head. It is of the construction – Noun + Clause.
The head of this big noun phrase is “the great investigators”. Now the “who” clause that modifies “the great investigators” cannot be placed anywhere else in the sentence. This gives “gathering”, a noun modifier, the liberty to jump over the preceding modifier and modify the head – “the great investigators”. Hence, “gathering” in this sentence is correctly modifying “the great investigators”.
Futhermore, logically “earth” cannot gather information. |
|