- UID
- 646720
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
求问大牛google出来的一段话搞的我很虚 Most recommenders either ignore weaknesses altogether (“If Andre has any weaknesses I haven’t encountered them”) or recast virtues as vices (“perfectionist,” “works too hard”). Both approaches fail because they’re hard to believe and because too many other recommenders use them. Unless a school’s recommendation form insists that your recommender discuss a personal weakness, a much safer approach is to focus on skill-specific or professional/functional weaknesses. In any event, if the weakness your recommender is considering is (a) not an obvious vice or character flaw (e.g., bigotry), (b) doesn’t routinely impede your effectiveness, (c) can be rectified, and (d) may in fact be a function of your age (i.e., maturity related) then it will not damage your admission chances. Remember to anchor the weakness section with a brief example. And, remember, your recommender shouldn’t say you’ve addressed your weakness—that means it’s no longer a weakness! It’s OK to be “working on it.” 这外国人是真懂还是装的啊………… |
|