ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 895|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Help : Prep08 202 关于比较

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-12-7 21:36:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请问:The amount of pollutant emitted by A is twice as much as that emitted by B 等价于 the amount of pollutant emitted by A is twice as much as is emitted by B吗?
后者这种比较该怎么理解呢? 谢谢了。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-12-7 22:35:20 | 只看该作者
嗯,我觉得这两个形式可能都有点问题,但我说不太清楚,我把Ron的解答发给你吧,希望对你有用。
RON:
i think the combination of "amount" and "as much as" would be tagged as redundant and therefore wrong.
i am not 100% on this, as the gmat's usage preferences are rather slippery at times, but there's no doubt that this suggestion is inferior to the version without "as much as".
shorter versions:
amount X is twice as much as amount Y --> inferior, and possibly even wrong (redundant)
amount X is twice amount Y --> undoubtedly better
另外针对你说的“the amount of pollutant emitted by A is twice as much as is emitted by”
RON:the real problem is that "is" has no parallel in the first part of the comparison - i.e., the first part doesn't say "is emitted" or "are emitted" - and so the comparison is wrong.
第二种形式在ron看来是错的,is没有平行的对象
我也得自己研究一下了。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-12-8 09:25:42 | 只看该作者
嗯,我觉得这两个形式可能都有点问题,但我说不太清楚,我把Ron的解答发给你吧,希望对你有用。
RON:
i think the combination of "amount" and "as much as" would be tagged as redundant and therefore wrong.
i am not 100% on this, as the gmat's usage preferences are rather slippery at times, but there's no doubt that this suggestion is inferior to the version without "as much as".
shorter versions:
amount X is twice as much as amount Y --> inferior, and possibly even wrong (redundant)
amount X is twice amount Y --> undoubtedly better
另外针对你说的“the amount of pollutant emitted by A is twice as much as is emitted by”
RON:the real problem is that "is" has no parallel in the first part of the comparison - i.e., the first part doesn't say "is emitted" or "are emitted" - and so the comparison is wrong.
第二种形式在ron看来是错的,is没有平行的对象
我也得自己研究一下了。。。
-- by 会员 DesmondWang (2012/12/7 22:35:20)



谢谢,我也再研究一下。。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-12-8 09:52:31 | 只看该作者
If the noun is an explicitly numerical quantity, then you should use neither much nor many but twice or double by it self . -----http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/the-number-of-people-flying-first-t5600.html

e.g. the increase of this year's GDP is twice as much as that of last year's GDP-redundant
      the increase of this year's GDP is twice that of the last year's GDP
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-8 23:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部