嗯,我觉得这两个形式可能都有点问题,但我说不太清楚,我把Ron的解答发给你吧,希望对你有用。 RON: i think the combination of "amount" and "as much as" would be tagged as redundant and therefore wrong. i am not 100% on this, as the gmat's usage preferences are rather slippery at times, but there's no doubt that this suggestion is inferior to the version without "as much as". shorter versions: amount X is twice as much as amount Y --> inferior, and possibly even wrong (redundant) amount X is twice amount Y --> undoubtedly better 另外针对你说的“the amount of pollutant emitted by A is twice as much as is emitted by” RON:the real problem is that "is" has no parallel in the first part of the comparison - i.e., the first part doesn't say "is emitted" or "are emitted" - and so the comparison is wrong. 第二种形式在ron看来是错的,is没有平行的对象 我也得自己研究一下了。。。 -- by 会员 DesmondWang (2012/12/7 22:35:20)
谢谢,我也再研究一下。。。 |