ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: MiaZhang
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] 比较和比较中的省略——给需要的同学

[精华]   [复制链接]
1971#
发表于 2017-6-12 17:57:17 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
1972#
发表于 2017-6-13 17:35:53 | 只看该作者
1973#
发表于 2017-7-16 00:09:15 | 只看该作者
live stock那道题that of 应该是被省掉的吧。。。
引用一段Ron的话:
you've learned a lesson here: the gmat's preference for that 'do' is not absolute.

from a 100% strict semantic viewpoint, i agree with you here: there's technically an ambiguity. however, we now have evidence, in the form of this problem, that the gmat doesn't consider ALL of these 'ambiguities' as truly ambiguous. rather, provided that the 'second meaning' is sufficiently absurd AND nonparallel (note the obvious logical nonparallelism of compairing total fat to livestock), it's ok to eliminate the 'do'.

sigh.

remember, we don't make the rules; they do. but with each problem like this one that you study, you'll have a better idea of exactly what their rules are.

感觉comparision问题算是high level的问题了,貌似没有太多确定的规律,好多时候是靠感觉啊。。。
1974#
发表于 2017-7-20 18:11:07 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
1975#
发表于 2017-7-20 20:54:51 | 只看该作者
遇到比较就懵逼
1976#
发表于 2017-7-21 09:03:35 | 只看该作者
ding
1977#
发表于 2017-7-24 21:58:14 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
1978#
发表于 2017-7-25 20:36:07 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
1979#
发表于 2017-7-25 22:20:43 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主
1980#
发表于 2017-7-26 15:23:21 | 只看该作者
赞!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-13 10:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部