- UID
- 1257859
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2017-1-14
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
live stock那道题that of 应该是被省掉的吧。。。
引用一段Ron的话:
you've learned a lesson here: the gmat's preference for that 'do' is not absolute.
from a 100% strict semantic viewpoint, i agree with you here: there's technically an ambiguity. however, we now have evidence, in the form of this problem, that the gmat doesn't consider ALL of these 'ambiguities' as truly ambiguous. rather, provided that the 'second meaning' is sufficiently absurd AND nonparallel (note the obvious logical nonparallelism of compairing total fat to livestock), it's ok to eliminate the 'do'.
sigh.
remember, we don't make the rules; they do. but with each problem like this one that you study, you'll have a better idea of exactly what their rules are.
感觉comparision问题算是high level的问题了,貌似没有太多确定的规律,好多时候是靠感觉啊。。。 |
|