ChaseDream
搜索
1234
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: amissrosa
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Amissrosa的作文帖--中英作文底子都不好...11/24將第一次考托福 求狠批><!!!感謝各位前輩!!

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2012-11-13 22:45:16 | 只看该作者

11.12.TPO24 修改

Thereading passage and the professor both discuss the topic of the remains ofblood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix in T-rex fossils. However,the professor discords with the ideas discussed in the article. He thinks thatthose remains were disregarded(被忽视不对,可以换个说法)and then offers several reasons to oppose.


Thefirst thing mentioned in the passage is that the fossilized leg bone revealedbranching channel which left soft organic tissues and considered as the remainsof blood vessels. However, the lecturer points out the opposed idea. HeThe professorsaysthat, after a creature died(creatures death), bacteria occupy organs, including the hollow ofbones, and they left traces of moisture residue which is not relative to bloodtissue.

Seconds,the professor argues the presentation of sphere discussed in the article. Heindicates that the spheres in T-rex fossils were also discovered in otheranimals' remains; however, these animals don't have red blood cells. Besides,it might be some mineral that makes the sphere of(in the fossil of)T-rex reddish.

Thethird point in the passage is the presence of collagen. Nevertheless, thelecturer mentions that the oldest collagens were found no longer 100,000 years;that is, there is improbable that there was the collagen of T-rex because T-rexwas older than 700,000 years. Those remains of collagen may be left by othercreature, such as human skin.

Inconclusion, the professor points out three dimensions to oppose the ideas inthe passage. The professor disagrees that there are remains of blood vessels,red blood cells, and collagen matrix in T-rex fossils.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS



近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-5 22:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部