求解OG13th 的 sc113！ 感谢感谢！！！~~~

yangyaci

As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
A.As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
B.A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult.
C.As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult.
D.A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.
E.As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500.

想请教大家一下
这道题中OG中B选项说the final phrase 是模糊的 为什么模糊呢？
还有E选项中 说which也是 但是我觉得which就是直接指代的“sense of vision”， 到底问题是出在哪了呢？

希望各位大侠能解答一下，感激不尽~

DUKB24

this excel may help you



this question also appear in OG12

rainzh

首选B选项中的 , or legally blind as an adult 的or这个连词使用的有问题。曼哈顿上说or是一个连词，那他应该连接并列的nouns或者并列的句子，此选项中or后面的成分不是一个句子也不是一个noun phrase。lz的理解如果是or 结构想要解释这个20/500的话，同位语a rate that应该可以用，但是用or是没有意义的。而且 as an adult也是一个歧义的表达。在这句话里面是没有比较的。
然后E选项which确实可以认为修饰sense of version,但是应该用被动would be deemed，就算改成被动，which修饰sense of version也是错误的，句意会变成sense of version would be deemed legal blind for adult. 正确的表达应该是有这种视力的成年人被认为是blind。所以which用在这里是不合适的。

个人意见，仅供参考哈~~请NN们指导~

deedeezz

D.A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.

请教would前面那个that的用法～我咋觉得这句没谓语啊～～

kiwifoodtown

D.A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.

请教would前面那个that的用法～我咋觉得这句没谓语啊～～

-- by 会员 deedeezz (2013/3/8 11:41:11)

that would be rated about 20/500作为定语修饰 a rudimentary sense of vision。

joannahope

kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-3-8 12:17
D.A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be r ...

同样是D选项 我第一次看这个选项的时候把这排除了 我觉得that指代不清楚呀  是指代的baby还是指代的sense of vision? 是我想多了吗 还是我根本想错了 》请指点

kiwifoodtown

joannahope 发表于 2014-9-23 22:04
同样是D选项 我第一次看这个选项的时候把这排除了 我觉得that指代不清楚呀  是指代的baby还是指代的sense ...

建议你学习一下定语从句。

gloriaaaaaa

joannahope 发表于 2014-9-23 22:04
同样是D选项 我第一次看这个选项的时候把这排除了 我觉得that指代不清楚呀  是指代的baby还是指代的sense ...

that 指代的是sense of vision啊~~这句的谓语是emerge

joannahope

kiwifoodtown 发表于 2014-9-24 09:59
建议你学习一下定语从句。

这句话我第一次看 以为 a baby 是主语 但是仔细看后发现不服逻辑  定语从句也可以看成是noun modifiers 把 通常情况下touch rule没有问题的  但是在Manhattan中给出了几个exception的情况 eg he had a way of dodging opponents that impressed the scouts中这个that impressed the scouts 就是修饰了 a way的   但是Manhattan得noun modifier exception中 第一种情况当真让我迷惑  说是the phrase(dodging opponents) that define the noun(a way)   说dodging。。。。是第一修饰语 我这里理解为essential modifier 可是考试的时候我不会这样想 如果让我改写句子 我会认为 he had a way that impressed the scouts by dodging opponents.但是按照Manhattan的说法 我就把 first modifier改变了 是不是就不对了尼？如果考试 我就会看看有没有语法的错误 有没有逻辑的错误 什么essential modifier 什么的 我根本不会去想 我这种思路是不是不对的？我是个刚看一个多月的小菜鸟 希望nn 指点我

kiwifoodtown

joannahope 发表于 2014-9-24 13:26
这句话我第一次看 以为 a baby 是主语 但是仔细看后发现不服逻辑  定语从句也可以看成是noun modifiers  ...

你如果把he had a way of dodging opponents that impressed the scouts中这个that impressed the scouts改成he had a way that impressed the scouts by dodging opponents. 那你就大错特错了，你就改变了句子的原本意思，使逻辑意思完全不同了。定语从句是就近修饰，所以你应该把a way of dodging opponents看成一个整体， that impressed the scouts就是修饰这个整体的，这里不需要机械的割裂dodging opponents和a way，从逻辑意思上看，that impressed the scouts也是对a way of dodging opponents整体的修饰和解释，拆开来了反而不对。