ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lloocc000
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助关于OG13 SC 21题题干的问题

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2012-10-10 04:28:50 | 只看该作者
定语从句的引导词就是修饰其先行词啊。。。。从句呀亲,,从句。。。
12#
发表于 2012-11-26 14:26:53 | 只看该作者
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything


题干中标红处"... foods that do not...",为什么that可以用来修饰复数的foods啊。而且OA对于B选项不正确的原因也只是说distorts the meaning  by referring to foods,意思就是说that指代foods是正确的。


求解释啊。多谢各位解答啊。
-- by 会员 lloocc000 (2012/10/8 23:05:42)






LZ可能被OG的that-clause平行的框架限制住了


经常我们在OG看到的that-clause 的平行都是 people say that....and that..这时这样的平行    谁都没有问题,很快就能辨别出来


而我们要记住的一点是and or but  这3个其实都是parallel marker,我们只是平时太注重第一个而已


所以


这里OG的解释是对的


foods that .... or that (就是一个possible misinterpretation!)


despite “has been” cannot modify foods


but the structure will create faulty  parallelism, and that is the point of OG
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/8 23:14:32)

B选项除了指代不对,是不是还有一个错误就是加入that把前面的平行破坏了啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 00:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部