ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales they would in the past have conceded to rivals.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 13791|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

定语从句里面的that可以省略吗?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-30 23:30:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
我记得好像是不可以的。。。。但是,偶尔也会看见省略。。。纠结啊。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-10-1 00:38:05 | 只看该作者
如果在从句里做宾语,可以省略,如果做主语,且是that be形式,that be可一同省略。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-1 01:26:56 | 只看该作者
多谢!请问,同位语从句里面的that可以省略吗?
地板
发表于 2012-10-1 08:11:15 | 只看该作者
要看that在同位语中的用法。 如果同位语中的that引导定语从句修饰前面的名词,则同定语从句用法一致。
5#
发表于 2012-10-1 08:19:37 | 只看该作者
多谢!请问,同位语从句里面的that可以省略吗?
-- by 会员 slr257 (2012/10/1 1:26:56)

不能,that在同位语从句里不做任何成分,仅仅起引导同位语作用,但是不能省略。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-1 08:29:13 | 只看该作者
多谢,我了了。那么,我们能不能说我们LS的LS错了呢。。。。
7#
发表于 2012-10-1 08:57:42 | 只看该作者
多谢,我了了。那么,我们能不能说我们LS的LS错了呢。。。。
-- by 会员 slr257 (2012/10/1 8:29:13)

嘿嘿。。LS的亲我还是挺同意你的。。。。那个LSDELS说的很搞笑,都同位语的that了,怎么还用到定语从句中了呢。。。无语。。。名词性从句that和定语从句that就是省不省略的关键啊。。。。。。
8#
发表于 2012-10-1 09:25:42 | 只看该作者
that引导宾语从句的时候貌似可以省略(manhattan的知识点)

摘自总结
that的省略(功能相同或平行的情况下是可以省略的):
basically, it's ok to omit "that" if the sentence is still legitimately parallel without it.
for instance:
food that is nutritious for cats but that is poisonous for dogs
food that is nutritious for cats but is poisonous for dogs
food that is nutritious for cats but poisonous for dogs
all correct.


hand signs that natives use and that appear in local rituals --> correct.
these are both that-clauses that modify "hand signs", so the parallel structure works.


BUT(一个做主语一个做宾语是不能省略that的!)
hand signs that natives use and appear in local rituals --> INCORRECT.
the second of these doesn't work because the right-hand component of the parallel structure is appear in local rituals (i.e., active verb whose subject is "hand signs"). there is no verb in the left-hand side that is parallel to this, so this makes no sense.


the only verb on the left is "use", which is NOT parallel to "appear" -- the former is something that natives do, while the latter is something that the hand signs do.
9#
发表于 2012-10-1 09:28:52 | 只看该作者
多谢,我了了。那么,我们能不能说我们LS的LS错了呢。。。。
-- by 会员 slr257 (2012/10/1 8:29:13)

怎么说呢,他也没有错,他只是没看清楚说的是同位语从句, 他说的是同位语,估计是说这种形式:n1, n2+ that 这种同位语,that引导定语从句修饰前面的n2
10#
发表于 2012-10-1 09:34:33 | 只看该作者
that引导宾语从句的时候貌似可以省略(manhattan的知识点)

摘自总结
that的省略(功能相同或平行的情况下是可以省略的):
basically, it's ok to omit "that" if the sentence is still legitimately parallel without it.
for instance:
food that is nutritious for cats but that is poisonous for dogs
food that is nutritious for cats but is poisonous for dogs
food that is nutritious for cats but poisonous for dogs
all correct.


hand signs that natives use and that appear in local rituals --> correct.
these are both that-clauses that modify "hand signs", so the parallel structure works.


BUT(一个做主语一个做宾语是不能省略that的!)
hand signs that natives use and appear in local rituals --> INCORRECT.
the second of these doesn't work because the right-hand component of the parallel structure is appear in local rituals (i.e., active verb whose subject is "hand signs"). there is no verb in the left-hand side that is parallel to this, so this makes no sense.


the only verb on the left is "use", which is NOT parallel to "appear" -- the former is something that natives do, while the latter is something that the hand signs do.
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/1 9:25:42)

你应该是想说that引导定语从句做宾语的时候可以省略吧?that引导宾语从句的时候只有很少几个动词后面可以省略,如say, announce,其余的动词基本都不能省略。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 09:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部