求助OG 13 114题！！

stevenckguo

114.Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it. quickly reolacesit. sometimes by the animal overcomoensating and growing an extra one or two.
(A) one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating and
(B) one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and
(C) they lose one arm they quickly replace it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating,
(D) they lose one arm they are quickly replaced,with the animal sometimes overcompensating,
(E) they lose one arm it is quickly replaced,sometimes with the animal overcompensating,


想问一下，E选项为什么不可以呢，我感觉they的指代没有问题，求解释啊！！
谢谢！

stevenckguo

顶

stevenckguo

顶！

stevenckguo

哪位同学帮忙解答一下啊

sisichen666

E选项和明显句尾的overcompensating，growing——改变了原文and并列的平行关系（CDE同错）

stevenckguo

那么E选项仅仅是and的问题？

smilehxy

同问。我只是看不懂选项的解释。with/by到底有那么大区别么

sisichen666

[quote]
114.Starfish, with anywhere from five to eight arms, have a strong regenerative ability, and if one arm is lost it. quickly reolacesit. sometimes by the animal overcomoensating and growing an extra one or two.
(A) one arm is lost it quickly replaces it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating and
(B) one arm is lost it is quickly replaced, with the animal sometimes overcompensating and
(C) they lose one arm they quickly replace it, sometimes by the animal overcompensating,
(D) they lose one arm they are quickly replaced,with the animal sometimes overcompensating,
(E) they lose one arm it is quickly replaced,sometimes with the animal overcompensating,


想问一下，E选项为什么不可以呢，我感觉they的指代没有问题，求解释啊！
谢谢！

-- by 会员 stevenckguo (2012/9/2 17:44:07)

[/quot还是把题都看一遍吧，
先看A，it quickly replaced it，一看就是两个it指代不同的事物，分别为starfish，arm（且starfish为复数，应用they），
再看D，同样的问题，they指代两个事物（starfish和arm）
再看E，首先感觉表达很别扭（arm it放在一起我觉得是不好，有重叠使用的感觉），而且放在一个句子里，应该保证一个主语吧（不过代词they但看前面的内容是没有问题的），
再看CDE共同处：结尾doing，doing，原文逻辑是：overcompensating 和growing是相互呼应的两个部分，应保证and连接

yakev6

If then结构中，主句从句主被动要一致。（OG说的，不太理解，记住好了）
先行词不能离代词太近，arm it, it不能指代arm
overcompensating和growing之间逻辑关系改变。

sisichen666

If then结构中，主句从句主被动要一致。（OG说的，不太理解，记住好了）
先行词不能离代词太近，arm it, it不能指代arm
overcompensating和growing之间逻辑关系改变。

-- by 会员 yakev6 (2012/9/26 20:58:55)

先行词不能离代词太近，arm it ，it不能指代arm，大叔。。。这句话怎么理解呢。。。是因为if then的原因，还是直接理解成“因为先行词arm紧接it代词，导致it不能指代arm？？