求助OG13一道新题！ 107

TerraceHo

恩恩，我明白了，謝謝你呀!!!^^

akaa

LSS，请问 这里为什么用for 不用和前面平行的of呢？

akaa

LSS，请问 这里为什么用for 不用和前面平行的of呢？

-- by 会员 akaa (2012/11/23 10:33:23)

顶顶！！请问有人知道吗？

sicilia小山

想問一下，
While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
上面the same as爲什麽後面會有個for呢？
E選項The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
有什麽問題嗎？
謝謝。

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/10/14 16:11:49)

至于E，is made more expensive 你不觉得很多余么，就 is more expensive 不就很清晰明了么？

TerraceHo

LSS，请问 这里为什么用for 不用和前面平行的of呢？

-- by 会员 akaa (2012/11/23 10:33:23)

(B) While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.

（1）看到前面部份，先確定comparison signal，即the same as
（2）把比較的雙方完整地寫出來應該是：
the cost of running nuclear plants is...//the cost of running other types of power plants is...
（3）把（2）中的內容代入原句，即the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as the cost of running other types of power plants.
        如果比較雙方的內容真如（2），omit的時候應該選擇性地將the cost變成that，或者直接將the cost去掉，變成：
      the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as (that) of running other types of power plants.                  【1】
（4）請留意，選項中出現了for，但是不見了running，證明（2）中列出比較雙方內容的時候與正確答案的不同。
       按照選項的意思，比較的雙方應該是：
the cost of running nuclear plants is...//the cost for other types of nuclear plants is...【注意，這裡用for把“of running”換掉了】
      所以，omit的時候就會變成：
      the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as (that) for other types of power plants.                                【2】

簡單來說，如果用of的話，應該是上面【1】句；用for的話，應該是【2】句。題目給的選項要不就是用for，要不就是of跟for都沒有。所以只能選用for的項了......
寫很長，不知道能不能幫到你呢…...

TerraceHo

想問一下，
While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
上面the same as爲什麽後面會有個for呢？
E選項The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
有什麽問題嗎？
謝謝。

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/10/14 16:11:49)

至于E，is made more expensive 你不觉得很多余么，就 is more expensive 不就很清晰明了么？

-- by 会员 sicilia小山 (2012/11/23 12:13:17)

謝謝ls^^
但是manhattan說concision要放到最後只剩下兩個選項左右優選的時候用，如果把concision當做優先的principle可能會誤選...
我覺得有concision問題的選項，應該同時會存在比concision更嚴重明顯的問題吧。上E項就是comparison有問題了.

CEALYN

那如果B选项中把for other types of power plants改成 that of other types of power plants对不对呀？是不是一定要用for结构呢？

想問一下，
While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
上面the same as爲什麽後面會有個for呢？
E選項The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.
有什麽問題嗎？
謝謝。

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/10/14 16:11:49)

LS 你看看， 题目是要比较是the cost of 和plants 的 cost ； 所以加个介词for 表示不是和plants比 ，E就错在这里了； 这里for 就是省略的 ( the cost )for other types or power plants .
清楚了吗？

-- by 会员 torresAing (2012/10/15 14:44:35)

akaa

LSS，请问 这里为什么用for 不用和前面平行的of呢？

-- by 会员 akaa (2012/11/23 10:33:23)

(B) While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.

（1）看到前面部份，先確定comparison signal，即the same as
（2）把比較的雙方完整地寫出來應該是：
the cost of running nuclear plants is...//the cost of running other types of power plants is...
（3）把（2）中的內容代入原句，即the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as the cost of running other types of power plants.
        如果比較雙方的內容真如（2），omit的時候應該選擇性地將the cost變成that，或者直接將the cost去掉，變成：
      the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as (that) of running other types of power plants.                  【1】
（4）請留意，選項中出現了for，但是不見了running，證明（2）中列出比較雙方內容的時候與正確答案的不同。
       按照選項的意思，比較的雙方應該是：
the cost of running nuclear plants is...//the cost for other types of nuclear plants is...【注意，這裡用for把“of running”換掉了】
      所以，omit的時候就會變成：
      the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as (that) for other types of power plants.                                【2】

簡單來說，如果用of的話，應該是上面【1】句；用for的話，應該是【2】句。題目給的選項要不就是用for，要不就是of跟for都沒有。所以只能選用for的項了......
寫很長，不知道能不能幫到你呢…...

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/23 12:54:49)

谢谢！！这几天我混迹在论坛，一直有看到你细致给力的解答呢~ 顶你！

TerraceHo

LSS，请问 这里为什么用for 不用和前面平行的of呢？

谢谢！！这几天我混迹在论坛，一直有看到你细致给力的解答呢~ 顶你！

哈哈，謝謝你啊，剛好在看manhattan，大家互相指教啦(>﹏<)

EMMALIULIU

这里A还有一个错误啊，我很纳闷为什么没人说呢？
这里把to run nuclear plants 和 other types of power plants比较了，明显不对了呀。OG解释里面也没有提出这个错误点。而且这题我就是靠比较对象是否具有可比性选出B的。
是我的思路错了吗？